By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Leaked Russian documents reveal the production of a new Iskander 1000 ballistic missile, a modernized 9M723-2 variant with a range of up to 1,000 kilometers, capable of striking numerous European cities. This extended range significantly expands the threat beyond Ukraine, especially as the missiles can be deployed from Russian territory or Kaliningrad. Despite existing sanctions, the missile relies on Western-made components, and not all involved companies are sanctioned. Experts suggest the EU should increase sanctions, improve enforcement, and address the use of Chinese technology to counter this threat.
Read the original article here
Russia Is Mass-Producing 1000-km Iskander Missiles That Can Reach Most of Europe, Leaks Reveal, and this has sparked a whirlwind of reactions, ranging from genuine concern to outright skepticism. The core claim, supported by supposed leaked information, centers on Russia’s capability to churn out a significant number of Iskander missiles with a range of 1,000 kilometers. This range, if true, puts a vast swathe of Europe within potential striking distance.
Now, let’s unpack the credibility of this claim because it’s crucial to understand the context. We’ve heard it all before, haven’t we? Russia’s been known to broadcast its military prowess, from showcasing the “world’s most advanced tanks” to touting its “unstoppable” hypersonic missiles. The skepticism is certainly justified when you consider that Russia’s track record includes a tendency to inflate its military capabilities, or spread disinformation.
The immediate reaction to this 1000-km Iskander news? For many, it’s not a complete shock. Ballistic missiles with this kind of range have been around for a while. However, the mass production aspect is what’s really catching everyone’s attention. If they *are* indeed mass-producing them, then this implies a significant ramping up of their offensive capacity. The question then becomes: where are they going?
Here’s where things get interesting and complex. The direct geographical implications of this capability are being debated. The 1000km range, while impressive, doesn’t necessarily cover all of Europe. Central Europe, yes, but Western Europe? That’s where the conversation gets a little more nuanced. It’s important to note the limitations.
However, the primary concern revolves around the potential threat to Ukraine. It’s a realistic possibility that these missiles would primarily be used to terrorize Ukrainian civilians. The war has been dragging on for years and the implications of this new development is causing fear.
Some are quick to dismiss the claim as fear-mongering and propaganda. They highlight that Russia is already bogged down in Ukraine and that such a move would be strategically unwise, opening up a second front against NATO. The claim about stockpiling missiles to terrorize Ukrainian civilians is a strong point.
On the other hand, the news prompts questions about Europe’s defensive capabilities. Europe, like the U.S. and China, also has the means to strike back. There are questions about anti-missile systems, such as the Arrow 2 batteries in Germany, and if they’re capable of handling a large-scale missile attack. This points to the need for understanding the availability of sufficient defense systems.
And then there’s the economic reality. Can Russia, with its current economic situation, truly sustain mass production of sophisticated weaponry? Some people have doubts about their ability to mass-produce such a system. The cost and logistics of such a massive operation are significant, and questions around corruption within the Russian military industrial complex also raise doubts about the efficacy and reliability of these new missiles.
What’s clear is that this development, if true, reinforces the need for vigilance and robust defenses. Building up anti-missile systems isn’t just about reacting to a potential attack; it’s also about deterring aggression.
The overarching sentiment is that, given the current geopolitical climate, this story is unlikely to de-escalate tensions. The fear is palpable, and the unknown of a potential WW3 looms large. The news is just one more piece of a complex puzzle, and only time will reveal the reality of the situation.