By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Africa Corps, a new Russian military unit in Mali that replaced the Wagner mercenary group, is reportedly perpetrating abuses mirroring Wagner’s tactics, including rapes and beheadings, according to refugees. Civilians fleeing the conflict described indiscriminate killings and sexual violence, with some reporting the removal of organs from victims. Despite the change in name, the methods and personnel remain largely the same, leading legal experts to assert that the Russian government is directly responsible for these actions. The escalating violence has left many civilians feeling trapped, as they are targeted by both the Africa Corps and affiliated Malian forces.
Read the original article here
As Russia’s Africa Corps fights in Mali, witnesses describe atrocities from beheadings to rapes. This is a chilling reality, and sadly, it’s not a new one. The reports coming out of Mali paint a grim picture, with accounts of horrific acts that echo the brutality seen in other conflicts where Russian forces have been involved. Beheadings and rapes – these aren’t just isolated incidents; they’re described as a pattern of behavior, a part of the way this particular military unit operates.
Essentially, the situation in Mali under the Africa Corps is being likened to a situation such as Bucha, a reference that immediately evokes images of civilian massacres and war crimes. The parallels are stark and disturbing, highlighting a disregard for human life that seems to be a defining characteristic of this force. The ironic twist, of course, is that the Malian government initially requested this assistance.
The composition of the Africa Corps itself is a significant factor in understanding these atrocities. The comments suggest that these aren’t just regular soldiers; they’re the so-called “elite” troops, seasoned in the brutal realities of other conflicts. It seems that the best soldiers are reserved for the conflicts in Ukraine, with this “dregs” being sent to Mali. These are the individuals the Russian military is relying on to get the job done, regardless of the human cost. This leads to the very bleak conclusion that this is the face of the Russian military, and the Mali government invited this on themselves.
The accusations and events in Mali bring into question the idea that any foreign military is inherently moral. There is a general feeling that when foreign military forces are deployed, especially in unstable regions, they often operate with a degree of impunity, exploiting the chaos for their own ends. The comments suggest that a lack of oversight is a key factor. Without strong checks and balances, and with little regard for established protocol, those with ill intentions will continue their behavior.
The core issue appears to be the lack of ethical and moral training within the ranks. The suggestion is that, unlike many modern military units that prioritize ethical conduct to maintain effectiveness, the Africa Corps, and perhaps the wider Russian military, may not place as much emphasis on these principles. As a result, the atrocities become more likely, more frequent, and more ingrained in the unit’s operations. This makes the Russian forces even more dangerous to any civilians that fall into their path.
The Russian way of warfare seems to have a lasting impact on innocent people. This situation is further complicated by the fact that the Russian forces often target the civilian population and the infrastructure. The goal is to weaken the resolve of the resistance, but they only hurt the people in the area. These actions have far-reaching consequences, undermining any efforts towards stability and peace in the region.
The irony here is painful. The Malian government sought the removal of the French because of their “careful” approach, wanting a military that was willing to fight without restraint. The result? A new form of terror has emerged, as the country now faces the reality of the Russian forces. This is a very real example of what happens when oversight disappears.
The question of accountability is, of course, a critical one. Can Putin ever be held accountable? The international community is actively pursuing charges against the Russian government, and there is a concerted effort to hold individuals responsible for war crimes. However, the path to justice is long and complex. In order to see these crimes and hold those responsible in a court of law, we may never get the chance to witness.
The atrocities, unfortunately, do not seem to be isolated. The Russian military, or at least the factions deployed to Mali, appear to have a long history of this type of behavior. This suggests a systemic problem within the force, one that goes beyond the actions of a few rogue soldiers. The implication is that this is a feature of their operational style, not a bug.
Finally, the broader implications of these events are something to consider. The situation in Mali is a microcosm of the larger geopolitical struggles unfolding around the world. As nations and individuals increasingly challenge the existing order, we see this type of conflict begin. The use of mercenary groups and proxy forces, the willingness to commit atrocities, and the disregard for international law – these are all warning signs of a dangerous new era.