By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Russell Vought, a prominent figure in the Trump administration, mirrors the persona of Charles Colson, a similarly partisan figure from the Nixon era. Like Colson, Vought embraces a dual identity, publicly showcasing both an aggressive political strategy and a deep commitment to Christian faith. Vought’s actions, which have included inflicting trauma on civil servants, utilizing his think tank aggressively, and defying legal precedents, are pursued alongside his declared devotion to Christianity. This combination of harsh political tactics and religious conviction challenges the traditional separation once held between these two aspects.
Read the original article here
Russell Vought’s actions and influence, compared to the relatively contained scandal of Watergate, represent a fundamentally more dangerous threat to the very fabric of American democracy. Where Watergate was a specific act of political malfeasance, Vought represents something far more insidious: a concerted effort to dismantle the structures of government and replace them with a theocratic, authoritarian vision.
The very essence of why Vought’s influence and agenda are so detrimental is his role in advocating for a radical transformation of the United States. He’s not just a hatchet man, but a true believer. He espouses a worldview that actively seeks to reshape American society, prioritizing a specific religious ideology above the principles of pluralism and separation of church and state. His vision, to those who understand its implications, is nothing short of a fundamental alteration of the nation’s core values. This includes a level of disregard for human dignity, as evidenced by his perceived comfort with child rape, so long as it achieves his political aims.
The sheer scale of the transgressions under the current administration, often facilitated and aided by individuals like Vought, dwarfs anything that occurred during Watergate. The current president’s alleged involvement with a pedophile ring, his history of criminality and documented disdain for democratic norms, and the widespread corruption within the government, are all magnitudes more damaging to the nation than the relatively contained acts of obstruction of justice that defined Watergate. The constant stream of scandals, the erosion of ethical standards, and the deliberate dismantling of institutions have created an environment where accountability is virtually non-existent, and where the rule of law is constantly under assault.
Watergate’s impact, though significant at the time, was primarily confined to the political sphere. It involved an abuse of power, a cover-up, and the eventual resignation of a president. However, the system ultimately functioned: investigations were conducted, the truth was revealed, and the democratic process prevailed. In contrast, the current era is characterized by an organized effort to undermine the very principles of democracy. This includes suppressing voting rights, spreading disinformation, and manipulating the judicial system. This is a far more pervasive and dangerous threat, and Vought’s actions are at the heart of it.
The ability to even use Watergate as a metric of comparison is itself a problem. The current environment has normalized behavior that would have been unthinkable just a few decades ago. Things like a president openly insulting veterans, inciting violence, and cozying up to hostile foreign powers are now commonplace. The media, in many ways, has been bought and paid for, creating a mediasphere that protects the perpetrators of these crimes. Outrage and accountability don’t move the needle anymore.
The sheer brazenness of the current transgressions, coupled with the apparent lack of consequences, highlights the gravity of the situation. Vought’s influence, his agenda, and his apparent disregard for the law and the well-being of the American people place him in a category of threat far more serious than anything Watergate represented. The current efforts aim to fundamentally and irreversibly change the country. This is treason, plain and simple, and far more dangerous than anything Nixon ever attempted.
Ultimately, Watergate serves as a stark reminder of the importance of checks and balances, the rule of law, and the need for a vigilant citizenry. However, it’s also a reminder of how times have changed, and how the threats facing democracy have evolved. Vought and those he represents pose a threat that is far more comprehensive, far more insidious, and far more dangerous than anything that could be found in the Watergate scandal. In this context, Watergate seems almost quaint, a relic of a bygone era.