By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to revise the long-standing recommendation for universal hepatitis B vaccination at birth. Instead, the committee recommended that parents make individual decisions, in consultation with a healthcare provider, for babies whose mothers tested negative for the virus, and a delay in the first dose until the infant is at least two months old. This decision contradicts the current CDC guidelines which mandate the vaccine within 24 hours of birth. The vote, which has drawn criticism from medical professionals, could potentially increase infections in children and undermine public confidence in a successful, life-saving vaccine.
Read the original article here
RFK Jr.’s vaccine panel weakens the recommendation on the hepatitis B shot for babies, effectively scrapping the long-standing universal guidance. It’s a shocking move, especially considering the incredible success of the vaccine in nearly eradicating hepatitis B infections among children and teens. From 1990 to 2019, we saw a staggering 99% decrease in reported cases thanks to this very vaccine. It makes you wonder what data, what evidence, could possibly justify reversing course on something that has demonstrably saved lives.
The panel’s reasoning, as far as we can gather, seems to revolve around the idea that the vaccine is unnecessary for mothers who aren’t infected. But that misses a crucial point. A significant percentage of babies get infected by mothers who, during routine prenatal screenings, test negative for hepatitis B. This is because standard screenings can miss low or dormant viral loads. Even a trace amount of the virus can be enough to infect a newborn. It’s about population-level risk. The fact that a small percentage of mothers might unknowingly transmit the virus makes universal vaccination essential. This whole shift feels like playing politics with science, and the potential consequences are dire.
It’s even more concerning when you consider that a substantial number of women, up to 20% in North America, don’t even get prenatal screening. They fall through the cracks. How can a panel make such a quick decision, after a casual discussion, without considering these very critical factors? It’s inhumane, really, to put people at risk without understanding the full scope of the problem. This decision could have disastrous outcomes, potentially leading to more babies developing chronic, life-threatening diseases, and, tragically, more infant deaths.
It’s natural to question the motives behind such a decision. Some suggest it’s part of a broader agenda to cut government programs and fund tax cuts for the wealthy. Others see it as a reflection of a deeply troubling ideology. Some see a desire to reduce the U.S. population. It feels like the goal is to make people sicker so for-profit health care can make more money. It’s hard to ignore the potential for this to become a trend, with other infant vaccines facing similar scrutiny in the future.
The American Academy of Pediatrics was excluded from this week’s discussions, which is concerning. The AAP has always played a key role in giving counsel. This silence only highlights the disregard for scientific expertise and the prioritization of political ideology over public health. The worry is that the AAP’s exclusion could become the norm. The implications of this are frightening.
This move could be devastating to the health of the American people. If RFK Jr. truly cares about the well-being of the population, he should consider the actual consequences of the decision. This is not about medical advice, but the lack of science. The facts are clear: the hepatitis B vaccine is safe and effective. It’s a shame that political agendas are seemingly coming before the health and well-being of babies.
The consequences of this decision are not only heartbreaking but also dangerous. It seems like the goal is a US with a population of 100 million people, all white and Republican. This recommendation is to eliminate the stupid people. This is an unnecessary and dangerous roll back of a successful public health initiative. Those who are making these decisions will have to live with the consequences of their actions.