By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Republicans have largely remained silent regarding Hegseth’s actions, which have resulted in numerous casualties. However, GOP-led committees in both the House and Senate are now focusing their attention on the Pentagon, requesting a thorough investigation into the September boat strikes. Chairmen of the Armed Services committees are demanding access to audio and video recordings of the incident, with the intention of uncovering the facts. Senator Tillis is specifically seeking clarity on whether Hegseth ordered a subsequent strike, which resulted in the death of survivors.
Read the original article here
Top Republicans Turn Against Hegseth, Demand Video of Boat Strike – Trump’s defense secretary is slowly losing the support of leading Republicans in Congress.
The situation is escalating, and it seems like the cracks are starting to show. Leading Republicans are turning on Hegseth, the Trump administration’s Defense Secretary, and the pressure is building for a damning video to surface. The underlying currents here are fascinating: we see a struggle for control, a desire to distance themselves from potential scandals, and perhaps a strategic move to reposition the party. The initial premise is that the administration is a collection of unqualified individuals who are now in a precarious position. When the inevitable blame game begins, threats of exposure and whistleblowing will be the order of the day.
The core issue appears to be a boat strike, and the allegations of illegal orders to harm or kill survivors. Senators like Thom Tillis and Lindsey Graham, who until recently seemed aligned, are now expressing concern, even suggesting potential legal and ethical violations. Graham’s comments on the matter suggest that the actions may have violated long-held laws of war. The idea that you would kill survivors, who are no longer combatants, is completely against the principles of war and common sense. The potential scenario is horrific: if the video depicts Navy Seals approaching the destroyed boats and then shooting the survivors. The questions are obvious: why aren’t they inspecting the boats? Why aren’t they detaining the survivors, assuming they have committed a crime?
This shift in sentiment might be a strategic maneuver. It seems the administration may be testing the waters for a future move. The party might be using these strikes as a way to normalize killing of those it deems to be “drug traffickers.” Republicans like Don Bacon are clearly dragging their feet on this matter, and that’s an issue in itself. It’s hard to ignore the broader context: the potential for these actions to serve as a test case for more aggressive tactics. The key point is: these actions have been described as illegal.
The Republican party is facing a pivotal moment, and their reactions are complex. The Republicans are in a tough spot: they can’t risk Trump’s ire, nor can they afford the political damage of being associated with such actions. The concern from the Republicans seems to suggest that there’s a need to maintain the appearance of integrity. The irony is that, by confirming people with dubious qualifications for key positions, the party may have sowed the seeds of their own discontent. The fact that the moral of those in the Pentagon is low is not a good sign. The lack of open support, even from their own Senators is telling.
Ultimately, this whole situation might be about more than just a single incident. There are hints about Project 2025 and the broader conservative agenda. They seem like they may be looking for an exit strategy, a way to reshape their image. It is all the more reason to find an excuse to remove Trump from the scene. If Trump is removed, it might be the start of a new chapter for the GOP. Perhaps a shift towards a more conventional leadership. We’ll see how serious they are, or if this will just be a political dance. The Republicans have to decide between their desire to maintain power and the risk of being associated with actions that many are calling war crimes. It seems like the Republicans may need Trump, but not want him in the long run. They know the price that may be paid.