By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Recent polling by NBC News reveals a shift in Republican allegiance, with a seven-point decrease in those identifying with the MAGA movement since April 2025 and a corresponding increase in those aligning with traditional Republicanism. This shift comes amidst concerns about the GOP’s performance in the upcoming midterm elections, which could impact Donald Trump’s brand and influence the party’s future. The poll, conducted from November 20 to December 8, indicates that 50% of Republicans identify with MAGA, while the other 50% feel more linked to the Republican Party. The analysis highlights potential challenges for the GOP, especially if the economy remains weak as the election campaign progresses.
Read the original article here
The number of Republicans Identifying as MAGA Plunges, at least ostensibly. The narrative seems to be shifting, with some Republicans distancing themselves from the MAGA label. The question is, how genuine is this shift? Are we witnessing a true change of heart, or simply a strategic rebranding exercise? It’s a question that many are asking, and the answers are likely complex and varied. The data itself shows a decrease in self-identification as MAGA, but does this reflect a deeper transformation?
Don’t kid yourselves, those who voted for the former president own every action of the MAGA movement, and that includes the rhetoric, the policies, and the consequences. It’s hard to believe that those who embraced the label so enthusiastically are now suddenly having second thoughts. It is going to be a lot of “Well I never supported him” coming in the future. The sentiment among many is clear: once MAGA, always MAGA. They may shed the outward trappings, the merchandise, and the overt declarations, but the underlying beliefs and the voting patterns may not change. The core principles often associated with MAGA—nationalism, populism, and a certain brand of cultural conservatism—likely remain.
The hypocrisy is frustrating for many. There is a sense of wanting them to remain visible, to not be allowed to blend back into polite society after supporting policies that could be seen as damaging. In other words, many don’t want these people to avoid facing the consequences of their choices. It is akin to a criminal trying to hide their crime, a kind of denial and deception that does not warrant respect. This sentiment echoes the idea that they shouldn’t get to simply walk away from the damage they’ve caused.
The data itself can be interpreted in different ways. Is a drop from 57% to 50% a significant shift? Or is it merely a slight adjustment, a tactical move to soften the image? Some might argue that even a small change indicates a growing unease with the label. It could be an early sign of a broader trend, reflecting concerns about electability. However, many see it as just a way to appeal to a wider audience, but nothing more. The core values, the voting habits, and the overall support for the former president could remain unchanged.
It’s tempting to want to celebrate anyone who admits they were wrong, but that is a difficult feat given the circumstances. It is understandable to want to encourage those willing to break from the pack. But it will take more than just a change in terminology, but a true acceptance of wrong-doing. If they really want to reject Trump and his actions, they should create a new party. Anything less, many believe, is insincere.
Ultimately, the argument comes down to a fundamental question of accountability. Do those who supported a political movement—even if they now distance themselves from its most divisive elements—escape responsibility for the consequences of that movement? Or is there a need for moral introspection and a true reckoning with the choices that were made? The people have been hurt by this movement. Many won’t forget, and won’t forgive. They will continue to watch and question the sincerity of those claiming to be done with MAGA.
This goes beyond just the individual, it extends to the party itself. Is the Republican Party truly evolving, or is it simply adjusting its messaging for political gain? Some see the party as still very much MAGA, regardless of how its members identify. The core policy objectives, the support for conservative judges, and the resistance to progressive policies likely remain, even if the tone and rhetoric have changed. The idea is that the underlying substance hasn’t changed, even if the aesthetics have been altered.
The key point here is that the label is not the most important aspect, but the behavior and political choices. The focus needs to be on actions, not words. The hope is that the people will not forget who supported the former president, and what they did. This sentiment can feel harsh, but it’s fueled by a belief that accountability is crucial, that actions have consequences, and that true change requires more than just rebranding.