By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondent Peter Arnett has passed away at the age of 91. Arnett, known for his fearless reporting, covered conflicts from the Vietnam War, where he won a Pulitzer Prize in 1966, to the Gulf Wars, becoming a household name. He was also known for his exclusive interviews and his controversial comments during the Iraq War led to his dismissal from NBC. Arnett’s career spanned decades and various news outlets, leaving a lasting impact on journalism.
Read the original article here
Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Peter Arnett, who reported on the Vietnam and Gulf wars, has died, and it’s impossible not to feel a sense of loss for a true giant in the field of journalism. Thinking about his passing brings back a flood of memories, not just of his reporting, but also of the crucial role he played in shaping how we, the public, understood some of the most pivotal conflicts of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. His courage, commitment, and dedication to his craft are truly remarkable.
Peter Arnett’s bravery was undeniable, especially when you consider the perilous situations he willingly placed himself in to bring us the truth. The image of him reporting from the heart of Baghdad during the Gulf War, capturing video of combat in the city, really highlights the risks he was prepared to take. That’s not just reporting; that’s living the story, putting his life on the line to inform the world. The man was persistent, a quality that is absolutely essential for any journalist wanting to get to the core of a story.
He, along with Bernard Shaw, and John Holliman became synonymous with the Gulf War for many of us, myself included. I clearly remember the iconic coverage, the way they stayed on air until the power went out. The images, the sounds, the tension – it was all incredibly powerful. It created a raw connection to the unfolding events, a reality unfiltered by the usual layers of distance. They gave us access to a world many of us were far removed from, and it’s something that sticks with you. I can only imagine what it must have been like, being there with them, sharing their experience, in real-time.
It’s clear that Arnett’s reporting wasn’t always viewed favorably by all, especially towards the end of his career. It’s a reality of war reporting that is unfortunately, very common. He was dismissed in 2003, with some claiming his reporting sounded “anti-American” for criticizing strategies and interviewing Iraqi citizens. This highlights the tightrope journalists often walk, especially when covering conflicts where political sensitivities are high and the flow of information is often carefully controlled.
It’s interesting to consider that despite the complexities and controversies that sometimes swirled around his work, he’s remembered so fondly by so many. It underlines the importance of honest, independent reporting, and the public’s appetite for it, even when it’s uncomfortable or challenging to digest. He didn’t shy away from telling the story, even when it was difficult or unpopular.
And it’s a shame to hear about Peter Arnett. He was a New Zealander, like me. Seeing a fellow countryman achieve such prominence on the world stage, especially in a field as vital as journalism, is a source of pride. You could tell in his reporting. His lineage provided unique insights, and it likely helped shape his approach to the stories he told.
There’s a curious, almost surreal, element to his life story. The fact that his daughter married John Yoo, the Bush Administration attorney, is such an unusual juxtaposition. Yoo, of course, was involved in defending controversial practices during the Iraq War. It shows that even the most dedicated reporters have private lives, and those lives can intersect with the very events they cover in unexpected ways.
He was a true pioneer, a figure who helped define modern war reporting. His work, his courage, and his dedication to telling the truth, even when it was difficult, will be missed. He helped us understand the world, for better or worse. And for that, we can be truly grateful. The memories of his reporting, the impact of his work, will undoubtedly live on, as his legacy as a courageous and influential journalist is secured.