By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the Kennedy Center board’s decision to rename the venue the Trump-Kennedy Center, several artists have canceled their performances in protest. New York Dance Company Doug Varone and Dancers, the Cookers, and Kristy Lee are among those who have withdrawn. Kennedy Center President Richard Grenell has responded, criticizing the artists’ actions and claiming the previous leadership favored “far left political activists.” These cancellations add to a growing list of performances, including those by Issa Rae, that were previously canceled earlier this year, citing concerns about the center’s values.
Read the original article here
More Kennedy Center Performers Pull Out After Trump’s Name Change
The recent renaming of the Kennedy Center has sparked a significant backlash, and it’s clear the ramifications are far from over. More and more performers are opting out of scheduled appearances, sending a clear message about their values and priorities. It’s hard not to notice the underlying sentiment: this isn’t just about a name change; it’s about associating with someone who, to many, embodies a range of things that are considered antithetical to the spirit of art and cultural expression. The very essence of the Kennedy Center, its history, and its commitment to artistic excellence, now seems to clash with the image being imposed.
The sheer number of artists who are making the choice to distance themselves from the venue is noteworthy. The list of those canceling performances is steadily growing, reflecting a broad spectrum of artistic disciplines, from dance to jazz, and everything in between. It appears that the prospect of performing under the banner of a name change is a professional bridge too far. And it’s not just a matter of principle; many are concerned about the professional consequences of being associated with a figure who has become so deeply divisive. This seems especially true for those who have built their careers on a foundation of integrity and artistic expression free from political taint.
The threat of legal action, often a tactic employed to stifle dissent, clearly hasn’t had the desired effect. In fact, it seems to have emboldened more artists, solidifying their resolve. It’s almost as if the more pressure the other side puts on, the more determined these artists become to stand by their beliefs. This is a powerful statement about the importance of artistic freedom and the willingness to sacrifice certain opportunities for the sake of one’s values. There’s a sentiment among many that any artist who chooses to perform there, knowing the implications, is making a clear choice – a choice that others are actively refusing to make.
It’s easy to understand why the Kennedy Center would be a point of contention for many. Created to honor John F. Kennedy, a president known for championing the arts, the center itself has become a symbol of something important and deeply revered. To have that legacy seemingly co-opted or overshadowed is, to many, a travesty. The historical significance of the center, combined with the perception of the name change, has triggered a passionate response that goes beyond mere political disagreement. It’s about respecting the center’s history and not disrespecting the arts.
The reasons for pulling out of performances are varied, but the core message is clear: these artists are making a stand. Some may view it as a simple boycott, others as a powerful statement of solidarity. Many are also calling for the name to be changed back, emphasizing that they will only return once the original name is restored. The underlying message is that these performers are refusing to lend their talents to a space they no longer view as aligned with their values.
The potential for professional damage is a major consideration. No one wants to damage their reputation. The idea that any association with the center is a stain on their artistic integrity is a genuine fear, and it has prompted these artists to act in accordance with their values. This isn’t just about a name; it’s about a cultural and political battle. It’s also important to note the financial implications for the center itself. Fewer artists mean fewer performances, which in turn leads to less revenue and, potentially, the loss of jobs.
The controversy has also highlighted the importance of media coverage. Many feel that the journalists have a responsibility to not use the changed name. It’s about upholding journalistic standards and maintaining the Kennedy Center’s legacy. This refusal to acknowledge the renaming is a subtle but powerful way of resisting the change and emphasizing the institution’s artistic and cultural significance.
Critics are also asking questions about the former president’s supposed contributions to the center. It’s difficult to fathom what Trump did for the center to deserve the renaming. This lack of clarity has further fueled the outrage and contributed to the artists’ decision to boycott.
Ultimately, the situation at the Kennedy Center underscores a significant shift in the relationship between art, politics, and the public sphere. It demonstrates the willingness of artists to use their platform to make a statement and stand up for their principles. This is a story of artists refusing to compromise their values and, in doing so, challenging the status quo. The situation is evolving and will continue to be a major cultural battleground for some time.