By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Pentagon watchdog found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth risked U.S. personnel and mission security by sharing sensitive information about a military strike against Yemen’s Houthi militants via the Signal app. The report concluded that Hegseth violated Pentagon policy by using a personal device for official business, recommending improved training for officials. The investigation was initiated after a journalist was inadvertently added to a Signal chat revealing details, including strike timings. Although Hegseth maintains the information was unclassified, lawmakers raised concerns, with some suggesting that such actions would warrant dismissal for lower-ranking military personnel.
Read the original article here
Pentagon watchdog finds Hegseth’s use of Signal posed risk to US personnel, AP sources say. Well, this is a pickle, isn’t it? Apparently, the Pentagon’s watchdog has found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of the Signal messaging app while handling sensitive information created a risk for U.S. personnel and the missions they undertake. That’s what the Associated Press is reporting, based on sources familiar with the findings. You’d think that’d be a pretty big deal, wouldn’t you? It certainly seems like it should be.
The investigation centered around Hegseth using the app to communicate information about a military strike against Yemen’s Houthi militants. Now, the sources say the report did *not* find that he improperly declassified any material, which is a key point. He has the authority to do that, so that’s apparently not the issue here. But, and this is a big “but,” the report *did* find that he violated Pentagon policy by using his personal device for official business. They’re recommending better training for everyone, so maybe they should start with a class in “Don’t use your personal phone for this stuff.”
Hegseth apparently declined to be interviewed by the Pentagon’s inspector general, but he did provide a written statement. He’s standing by his actions, claiming he was allowed to declassify information and only shared details he felt wouldn’t endanger the mission. I can understand the importance of making sure troops are safe and the mission is protected. But, come on, using a personal device for classified information? That just doesn’t seem like a great idea, especially when there are secure channels for this kind of communication.
The thing is, the pressure on Hegseth has been building for a while now. Lawmakers had already called for an investigation into his Signal usage, and now there are new investigations into a report that he ordered “kill everybody” after a follow-up strike on an alleged drug-smuggling boat in the Caribbean. We knew about all this months ago. There have been discussions that he’s “like a 12 year old playing army,” which is honestly a bit concerning when we’re talking about someone in charge of the military. He’s been in the Army National Guard and deployed in Iraq, so this isn’t about being unaware; he should know what’s right and what’s very, very wrong.
We have a guy in a position of power, possibly ordering war crimes and putting troops in danger. This is serious stuff. And the fact that he’s still in the job… that’s a real head-scratcher. It’s almost as if some people saw the potential for this kind of trouble from the beginning. There’s a lot of frustration out there, and you can understand why. People are asking, “How did we get here?” and, even more urgently, “How do we get out?”
The thing that is clear is that this behavior wouldn’t fly in most other professions. If you did something like this in a private company, you’d be looking for a new job. Companies are super-strict about this kind of stuff. And honestly, it’s embarrassing for the government when things like this happen. But then again, this administration, with its lack of shame, seems to be pretty good at pushing the boundaries.
Some people seem genuinely surprised that Pentagon watchdogs still exist, let alone are finding issues with these sorts of actions. It feels like the whole system is just geared towards protecting those in power, while the real people paying the price are often the ones on the front lines. The feeling is that the response is mostly shrugs and “nothing to see here,” even when there might be a clear and present danger to military personnel.
The report’s findings put even more scrutiny on Hegseth. Some people point to him being perfectly cast by his boss, who cares about his image and is loyal to him. Someone who enjoys what he does and shares his views. But the fact remains that someone is at risk when something like this happens. It’s a sad state of affairs.
So, where does this all go? That’s the million-dollar question. Will there be any real consequences? Will this lead to any real changes in how the Pentagon operates? Or will this all blow over, with some extra training as the only takeaway? Right now, the answers are unclear. But one thing is for sure: this is another incident that’s raised serious questions about the leadership, judgment, and priorities of the Defense Secretary. And that, frankly, is a major problem.