By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Recent polling indicates a significant decline in U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s approval rating, plummeting 47 points in just ten months. The most recent survey, conducted shortly before the release of heavily redacted files associated with Jeffrey Epstein, revealed a record low approval rating for Bondi. This drop in popularity may reflect public dissatisfaction with the partial release of the Epstein files, as Democrats have called for the impeachment of DOJ officials, including Bondi. The continued decline in Bondi’s approval rating could potentially impact public confidence in the Trump administration.
Read the original article here
Pam Bondi’s approval rating collapsing by 47 points is certainly a headline that grabs your attention. It’s hard not to be struck by the sheer magnitude of that drop, especially in the relatively short timeframe that seems to be implied. Thinking about it, this really underscores a broader point about how some political appointments function. They often appear to be less about serving the public and more about serving the political interests of those in power.
Given the context, the phrase “most transparent administration in history” starts to ring a little hollow, doesn’t it? When you couple this with the heavily redacted Epstein files and a persistent defense of questionable actions, it’s understandable why trust erodes. It really makes you wonder how anyone could take such a claim seriously. And, let’s be honest, the fact that her appointment appears to be influenced by public opinion adds another layer of complexity to this situation.
The fact that her approval was so low is astounding, especially considering the context of her position. It seems the public’s perception of her has taken a drastic nosedive. The sentiment from years ago after The Pulse nightclub shooting shows that there is a history of unfavorable views. Looking back at her actions and associations, especially given her involvement in the Epstein case, it’s easy to see why. The very suggestion that she might be involved in covering up for or protecting a corrupt administration is damning, to say the least. It’s no wonder people are calling for investigations.
It is surprising that many people were even aware she had an approval rating to begin with. Some are noting this isn’t an elected position. Also, the fact that she may have simply been there to do the bidding of the former president is an important detail. If the polls look bad, she’d likely be replaced.
Her history in Florida, and the way she seemed to handle the case of child trafficking, is highly suspect. The lack of action, given the magnitude of the issue, just raises further red flags.
It seems the current administration’s actions regarding the Epstein files are also raising concerns, with victims apparently feeling threatened and not receiving any real support. There’s a clear indication that justice isn’t being served, and this can be seen as further fuel for the flames. With so many details and accusations swirling around, it is clear as day why her approval numbers are now so low.
The reality is that she seems to be acting as a tool for the former president. The approval ratings of the two may be linked as the two would be doing whatever he wanted. The lack of independent action, the focus on protecting specific individuals, and the alleged attempts to hinder justice all combine to paint a very clear picture.
The general sentiment, it seems, is one of disbelief that she even had an approval rating to begin with, and many are questioning how it could have plummeted so drastically. It is also noted that MAGA supporters seem to be turning on her, seeing her as a failure in both fulfilling Trump’s political goals and in her alleged role in covering up the Epstein case. She is seemingly becoming a convenient scapegoat, being sacrificed for the political ‘greater good’.