By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Attorney General Pam Bondi posted and then deleted a graph showing a decline in drug overdose deaths, attempting to give credit to the Trump administration for progress made under Joe Biden. The graph, tracking overdose deaths from 2015 to 2024, illustrated a spike before plateauing in 2022 and 2023, followed by a sharp decline during Biden’s term, which Bondi misrepresented. Social media users and politicians, like Rep. Ted Lieu, quickly pointed out the error, leading to the post’s deletion. Furthermore, concerns have been raised about potential risks to these gains due to Trump’s policies, including budget cuts to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Agency and aggressive actions in other countries.
Read the original article here
Pam Bondi Deletes Post After Getting Busted Lying for Trump: Here’s What Happened
So, let’s unpack this whole Pam Bondi situation. It seems like the former Attorney General of Florida, and a loyal Trump supporter, found herself in a bit of a pickle – busted for, let’s say, creatively interpreting some data. Specifically, she shared a graph on social media, aiming to tout the Trump administration’s success in lowering drug overdose deaths. The only problem? The graph actually showed the positive trend that began *during the Biden administration*. Oops.
The immediate fallout was predictable. Bondi, after getting caught red-handed, swiftly deleted the post. No surprise there. It’s a classic move: a quick digital eraser to try and sweep the evidence under the rug. But in today’s world, where screenshots are forever, the internet never forgets. The fact that she was trying to take credit for the progress of another administration just adds another layer to this situation.
The responses to the incident are varied, but one thing is clear: people are not particularly shocked. The general sentiment seems to be a weary sigh, a sense of “here we go again.” There is a strong feeling that this kind of behavior, twisting facts and taking credit where it isn’t due, has become par for the course. It’s seen as part of a pattern, and a well-established one at that. There is an undercurrent of frustration; the constant barrage of misinformation wears people down.
The conversation naturally veers towards the broader context of the Trump administration. The perception is of an administration marked by incompetence, corruption, and a fundamental disregard for truth. It’s a sentiment that permeates much of the discussion. The fact that Bondi, a high-ranking official, allegedly engaged in such behavior only reinforces this existing perception. It adds to the feeling that honesty and integrity are not particularly valued within this group of people.
The incident highlights a larger debate about the nature of truth and accountability in politics. The act of deleting a post, while perhaps understandable in the moment, raises questions. The argument centers around the fact that there should be some kind of accountability, some kind of consequence for such actions. Deleting a post is not the same as admitting a mistake; it’s a denial, a cover-up. It’s frustrating to watch someone take credit for something they had no part in and only seek to take a new direction once caught.
This whole scenario also raises questions about the role of social media in politics. These platforms have become battlegrounds for information, misinformation, and political posturing. The ability to quickly share and disseminate information, but also to delete and alter it, changes the landscape significantly. When something is presented as fact to the public, there should be some sort of penalty.
Looking beyond the specific incident, there’s a deeper concern about the direction of the country. Many are afraid of the erosion of truth and the blurring of lines between fact and fiction. This is something that could have serious consequences for the health of our democracy. If people can’t trust what they are being told, the foundations of the country become unstable.
Of course, the criticisms are not limited to just Bondi; it is a general criticism that goes out to all who are involved with Trump and his administration. The fact is that this is the norm and nothing new, even.
The response from the public underscores a significant problem: the normalization of dishonesty in politics. When this kind of behavior is seen as routine, it damages the trust between citizens and their leaders. This in turn, creates a dangerous cycle where people become cynical and disengaged.
The overall tone of the discussion is one of disappointment and concern. This is a story that, unfortunately, is more of the same. The focus is a sad statement on where the country stands today. The incident itself, while perhaps not groundbreaking, is a reminder of the challenges we face in navigating an increasingly complex and often misleading political landscape.