By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following public criticism, Timothy Loehmann was recently fired from his position as a ranger at a West Virginia resort community. This marks the fourth time in seven years that Loehmann has been let go from a small department after facing public backlash. Loehmann was the officer who fatally shot 12-year-old Tamir Rice in Cleveland in 2014, an event that sparked controversy and led to a settlement. Despite this, he continued to be hired and then subsequently fired or resigned from other positions, reflecting ongoing outrage over the incident.
Read the original article here
Officer who fatally shot Tamir Rice fired from West Virginia ranger position, and honestly, it’s a situation that feels like a broken record at this point. This is the fourth time in the last seven years that Timothy Loehmann, the former Cleveland officer who shot and killed 12-year-old Tamir Rice back in 2014, has been forced to leave a law enforcement-related position due to public outcry. The specifics of the most recent departure involve a ranger position in a West Virginia resort community, but the core issue remains the same: the public, understandably, is not willing to let Loehmann escape the consequences of his actions.
The repetition is almost unbelievable. Each time he gets a job, the news of his past surfaces, and public pressure mounts until he’s inevitably let go. It’s a testament to the power of public awareness and the lasting impact of Tamir Rice’s tragic death. It really makes you wonder how these departments, especially smaller ones, are even considering hiring him in the first place. This cycle highlights a glaring problem: how can a person who committed such a horrific act continue to be employed in any role that involves public trust or the use of force? The fact that he was sworn in as a police officer in Tioga, Pennsylvania, in 2022, and also left amid backlash, underscores this point. It’s hard to fathom how the hiring process fails to recognize the monumental red flags attached to his name.
And the public’s frustration is palpable, and entirely justified. People are understandably angry that this individual hasn’t faced true justice for the death of a child. It’s a sentiment that echoes through the comments, with many wishing for him to be unemployable, or even worse. The fact that the consequence for taking a young life has seemingly been a series of minor career setbacks simply doesn’t sit right with anyone. It highlights the vast difference in the outcome for Tamir Rice, who lost his life, and Loehmann, who seems to be navigating a series of temporary inconveniences.
The fact that he was fired due to public backlash, and not for any new act of violence, is a crucial point. It’s the original shooting, the act of killing Tamir Rice, that’s making it impossible for him to secure and keep a job. So, yes, the public is holding these departments accountable for poor decisions. However, the situation remains a grim reminder of the many avenues that are still open to him, even after taking a child’s life.
A disturbing trend seems to emerge in the kinds of places that hired him, specifically resorts catering to wealthy clientele. It is worth taking note, perhaps, that certain communities are more willing to overlook his past, or are perhaps less aware of it. It would be a disservice to ignore the underlying issue – that the system, in some ways, is failing to deliver accountability. The fact that he keeps getting hired, even if temporarily, suggests that some individuals or institutions are willing to take the risk. It underscores the challenges of holding individuals accountable for their actions, particularly within a system that often protects those in positions of power.
Given the current circumstances, it’s not surprising that many anticipate that he might find a place within an organization like ICE. It’s a chilling thought, but the comments reflect a concern that an individual with his history might be seen as an asset, given the standards and ethos of such organizations. The likelihood of that happening seems pretty high. The fact that he seems to only get jobs in government institutions where lawsuits are ultimately paid for by taxpayers speaks volumes.
The article serves as a powerful reminder of the lasting impact of Tamir Rice’s death. It’s a tragedy that continues to reverberate, forcing us to confront difficult questions about accountability, justice, and the consequences of actions. And it seems that people are correct in assuming he will soon take a government job where his lack of ethical behavior will be tolerated. The cycle is likely to continue, unless the circumstances of his departure lead to a permanent, and public, rejection of his employment by all institutions.