By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Interior Department has mandated that national parks review and remove gift shop items related to diversity, equity, and inclusion, aiming to maintain “neutral spaces” for all visitors. This directive aligns with broader efforts following executive actions by President Donald Trump targeting DEI programs across the federal government. Parks have until December 19 to review all retail items, a process confirmed by the Interior Department to ensure items inconsistent with the order are removed. The initiative has drawn criticism from groups like the National Parks Conservation Association, who view it as an attempt to “sanitize, soften or erase history.”
Read the original article here
National parks ordered to check gift shops for DEI-type items; it’s honestly a baffling situation. I mean, gift shops? Really? This directive from the Interior Department feels incredibly petty, like they’re scraping the bottom of the barrel to find something, anything, to keep busy. The idea that “DEI-type items” are the problem is just… well, it’s frustrating. What does that even mean? Anything with a woman, a person of color, or anyone from the LGBTQ+ community? It just smacks of an agenda, a desire to erase visibility, and that’s concerning.
Consider the context; we’re talking about national parks, places that, for many, represent the breadth and depth of the American experience. Sites like the African Burial Ground in New York, the Belmont–Paul Women’s Equality National Monument, and Stonewall are integral to understanding our nation’s history. These places tell the stories of African Americans, women, and the LGBTQ+ community, and the gift shops associated with these sites should reflect that. What are they supposed to sell? Generic beer cozies and keychains? Is a photograph of a rainbow over a waterfall now considered a forbidden item? It’s absurd. This is a clear attempt to whitewash history and erase the contributions and experiences of marginalized groups.
The implications are far-reaching. It feels like they’re trying to boil the frog slowly, chipping away at the recognition and celebration of diversity, equity, and inclusion. This isn’t just about gift shops; it’s a symptom of a larger trend, a worrying one. They’re starting small with “DEI-type items,” but the potential for expansion to schools, private companies, and beyond is genuinely frightening. It feels like a page taken straight from the Nazi playbook, and anyone who can’t see the danger in that is simply not paying attention. It’s a blatant disregard for the diverse tapestry that makes up the USA.
The directive itself states the aim is to create “neutral spaces that serve all visitors.” But what constitutes “neutral”? Is it really neutral to erase the representation of specific groups? Ironically, many see this action as the opposite of neutral. The phrase “DEI item” appears to have lost all real meaning and, in reality, it boils down to anything that depicts anyone who is not white. If something is white, it’s ok, but if it’s not white, it’s “DEI.” That’s hardly neutral; it’s a clear endorsement of one group’s dominance.
The very idea of scrubbing DEI items from gift shops seems like a futile exercise. The administration would be better served to solve real-world problems. This is the kind of stuff that keeps people up at night. And, quite frankly, this is an insult to the American values that are supposed to guide us. It is nothing more than political grandstanding that is unconstitutional, and a blatant violation of our right of association, first amendment, constitutionally protected speech.
This isn’t just about politics, it’s about the erosion of fundamental liberties. Is this not a violation of free speech? Or, are we talking about communism now? People vote with their dollars. Don’t tread on me or the dollar.
This whole situation is a symptom of something deeper, a fear of diversity and inclusion. Does this order imply that the federal government is more concerned with erasing visibility than with truly representing the nation’s diverse population? That is what it appears to be. This is the new definition of “neutral.” The whole thing is the type of political theater that will be seen as ridiculous in the future.
The emphasis on this “DEI type item” directive also opens a can of worms regarding the definition itself. What, exactly, constitutes a “DEI-type item?” A mug that says, “Don’t call your coworker the N-word?” A book by a female author? A postcard with a rainbow flag? The vagueness of the term only serves to amplify the potential for abuse and arbitrary enforcement.
This directive is simply a misguided use of taxpayer money. And the fact that they can’t sort out funding for health care or ACA but are micro-managing gift shops on a granular level across all the state parks makes this even more frustrating. It’s a sad state of affairs. This is not about progress; this is about a backward slide. It feels like a deliberate attempt to divide and alienate, and that’s not the kind of America I want to live in.