German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has cautioned that the decades of US-led security in Europe are diminishing. He urged European nations to anticipate a shift in transatlantic relations and enhance independent defense capabilities. Merz warned against underestimating the evolving strategic priorities of the US, suggesting future leadership could be less committed to European security. Additionally, he cautioned against appeasing Russia, emphasizing the potential for further aggression and threats to European borders.

Read the original article here

Merz Says ‘Pax Americana’ Is Ending, Urges Europe to Strengthen Independent Defence. The core of this message, as articulated by Friedrich Merz, is resonating deeply, and for good reason. The era of the “Pax Americana,” the period of relative peace and stability largely ensured by American dominance, is indeed showing signs of wear and tear. The suggestion that Europe needs to significantly bolster its own defense capabilities, rather than relying so heavily on the United States, is a crucial one. It’s a call to action that stems from a realistic assessment of the changing global landscape.

This isn’t just about a change in political parties in the US, nor the recent rise of figures like Trump. The underlying forces at play are far more significant. We’re talking about a potential shift in American priorities, a move away from its traditional role as the world’s policeman, and a growing focus on domestic concerns. Even before any of this, there were those within the US government who felt that Europe wasn’t the priority. This is a process that has been brewing for a while, and the US is turning its attention to other regions.

The implications for Europe are clear. A less reliable, or perhaps less *available*, ally necessitates a serious reassessment of its defense strategy. The comfortable reliance on the US, the decades of spending less on independent defense in favor of robust social programs, is no longer a viable option. The situation has highlighted a critical lesson of history: relying on a single power for protection is rarely a sustainable strategy.

It’s tempting to view this as a sudden shift, a direct result of political events. But the seeds of this change were sown long ago. Even during the Obama administration, there were clear signals of a “tilt” towards Asia. The writing was on the wall. This is a long process that will involve a range of transformations and will require Europe to prepare to stand alone. The sooner Europe acknowledges this reality and acts accordingly, the better.

The United States itself is facing its own internal challenges. There’s a fundamental reckoning underway, with debates about institutional safeguards, the social safety net, healthcare, and the influence of big money on politics. The future direction of the US is uncertain, and that uncertainty alone demands that Europe be prepared to navigate its own security independently.

It is important to remember that there may be a lot of change to come. Even in the midst of the uncertainty, America still has immense resources and firepower. This isn’t a situation where the US is going to disappear overnight. But the point is that Europe’s security can no longer be predicated on the unwavering support of another nation. It must develop its own means of defense, its own “European security architecture,” as some have put it.

There is a sense that the EU has been slow to grasp the changing realities. The recent actions by Germany, increasing their orders for American F-35s and considering purchases of missiles, highlight a reliance on US military hardware. This is a point of concern because of the focus on American systems. The urgency of the need for Europe to take its defense seriously can’t be stressed enough. The United States has been the primary guarantor of European security for a long time, and the time to move towards more independence is now.

The concerns about potential global instability are significant. The US withdrawal from its international role could create a vacuum, inviting other powers to fill the void. This could lead to a more volatile world order, with a heightened risk of conflict. This makes the need for a strong, independent European defense even more pressing.

The criticisms of the United States are not necessarily anti-American, it is more like pro-reality. The US is going through its own internal battles, which includes economic and social disaffection, and the spread of disinformation. These internal struggles will impact its ability and willingness to continue its role as the protector of Europe.

The need for a strong, independent Europe is undeniable. The historical perspective is crucial. For many centuries, war on European soil was an almost constant threat, and the recent peace was an exception to the rule. Now, the old threat is returning. Europe needs to acknowledge this and act.