By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Amidst rising Affordable Care Act premiums and the search for solutions, recent polling reveals strong public support for Medicare for All. A Data for Progress survey found 65% of likely voters, including majorities of Democrats and Independents, support a national health insurance program. This support remained consistent even when respondents were informed of the plan’s implications, like replacing private insurance and raising taxes. Meanwhile, current proposals from both parties offer temporary solutions, despite clear public desire for a more comprehensive healthcare system.
Read the original article here
Medicare for All Sees Key Polling Shift as Americans Fume Over Surging For-Profit Insurance Premiums
The current political landscape is undergoing a fascinating transformation, one driven by the undeniable reality of rising healthcare costs. There’s a palpable shift in public sentiment, and the catalyst is simple: Americans are feeling the squeeze of ever-increasing for-profit insurance premiums. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the existing healthcare model, heavily reliant on private insurance companies, is failing a significant portion of the population.
It’s almost a natural reaction when people realize their premiums are climbing faster than their paychecks. The feeling of being financially burdened by a system that’s supposed to protect their health is a powerful motivator for change. When essentials like firefighting, policing, and even waste management are recognized as public services, it’s reasonable to question why healthcare, a fundamental human need, is privatized and subject to the whims of the market. The cost of for-profit healthcare, as it is, is the cost of non-profit healthcare, plus the profit margins.
The frustration is palpable, and many are questioning why Medicare for All isn’t already the standard. Americans have been complaining for decades about the unaffordability of insurance and the claims denials. But, there’s a necessary caveat: any universal program must incorporate price controls on essential services. Hospitals shouldn’t be allowed to inflate the costs of even basic over-the-counter medications, and pharmaceutical companies shouldn’t be able to charge exorbitant prices for vital treatments. This unbridled form of capitalism is, frankly, unsustainable.
That frustration has translated into a noteworthy shift in public opinion. Recent data indicates substantial support for Medicare for All, even when confronted with arguments against it. These numbers, with support from a broad spectrum of voters, should be a call to action. Individual states are already exploring their own solutions to the healthcare crisis, and the efforts underway in states like Oregon, California, and Washington offer potential models. The goal is clear: to redirect healthcare funding toward care itself, not the profits of insurance companies and private equity firms.
The problems with the current system are extensive and far-reaching. The problems with the current system are extensive and far-reaching. Extremely high costs for both prescriptions and medical care are a significant issue. Many people are forced to forgo necessary medical attention due to financial constraints, even when they’re insured. The fact is, our healthcare system, despite its enormous expense, delivers subpar results compared to other developed nations with socialized medicine. Infant and maternal mortality rates are rising, and the for-profit model seems to be exacerbating these problems, creating the very “death panels” that the right loves to complain about.
The reality is that our healthcare system is the worst, and we pay more than anyone else in the world for abysmal results. One of the main points of concern is the current system’s focus on providing less care as a means to cut costs. The same price per participant leads to significantly less access to care. This isn’t just about the cut taken by for-profit insurance companies; overall costs are so high that they’re unaffordable for millions. Many people are priced out of basic care.
The implications of a shift to Medicare for All are significant. The potential surge in demand would necessitate careful planning to ensure adequate access to care. It would also demand an expansion of the healthcare workforce. This is a transformation that would ensure that everyone has access to medical care, which is a necessary step to ensuring that a large population remains healthy and therefore productive.
It’s worth noting the inherent flaws within the existing model. A system where for-profit entities act as gatekeepers to our health, prioritizing profit over patient care, is fundamentally broken. They take a large portion of the premiums to pay for administration costs and shareholder dividends. Such a system has many serious consequences.
Many people have realized that those who benefit the most from our broken system are the aristocrats running the show. The fact that the desire to eliminate Obamacare could lead directly to a Medicare for All system is telling of the current state of politics.
The core of the problem lies in the fact that healthcare premiums have consistently outpaced income growth for years. The recent rise in premiums is nothing compared to what may be ahead, further increasing the shifts in opinion. For-profit healthcare companies must continually increase their profits, which forces them to raise prices, reduce coverage, and deny claims. This is what it looks like when capitalism eats itself. The shift toward Medicare for All is a direct response to these pressures.