By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has reported over 700 death threats in the last five years, initially from the “left” and now from the “right” following her break with former President Trump over the Jeffrey Epstein files. The congresswoman, who has often been a staunch Trump ally, announced she will retire from her seat in 2026. Greene detailed the threats she has received, which included assassination threats against her and her son. This has contributed to a growing concern among lawmakers from both parties over rising political violence.
Read the original article here
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she’s received over 700 death threats, a number that immediately sparks a wave of reactions, ranging from disbelief to outright schadenfreude. The sheer volume is what grabs your attention first. It’s a significant number, and the immediate question that pops into mind is: how credible are these threats? And, perhaps even more importantly, from where are they originating?
The most common sentiment seems to be a lack of sympathy. This response is tied to Greene’s history of making provocative statements and targeting others, including those who have suffered from tragic events like school shootings. There’s a strong undercurrent of “you reap what you sow,” implying that her own rhetoric has, in a way, created the environment where such threats might flourish. It’s hard to ignore the irony, as many point out, in her being on the receiving end of the same kind of vitriol she’s often directed at others.
Many people find it interesting that the alleged threats started appearing after she shifted her stance towards Donald Trump. This suggests a potential origin – the MAGA base – and underscores a sense of betrayal within the right-wing ecosystem. This change in sentiment from within her own political sphere, is noted as highly significant. The implication being that the threats are not necessarily coming from the left, but rather from those who feel she has crossed the line and betrayed their cause. This adds another layer to the story, highlighting the internal divisions within the political right.
The contrast between her claims and the reality of threats received by other political figures is a major theme. The general feeling seems to be that figures like AOC likely receive far more threats on a regular basis. In addition, there is a recurring comparison to the alleged death threats made by Greene to others. In particular, the comments highlight the impact of her rhetoric and the potential for it to incite violence or threats against those she targets.
The nature of the threats themselves also gets questioned. The general view is that the authorities should take such threats seriously and investigate them. The question is also raised as to whether the authorities would act with the same level of urgency if the threats were directed at a Democrat or a left-leaning politician.
The overall sentiment is a mixture of cynicism and a degree of satisfaction. There’s a prevailing feeling that Greene is, to some extent, a victim of her own creation. Her history of stoking controversy and targeting others has seemingly backfired, leaving her vulnerable to the very attacks she may have indirectly encouraged. The fact that many people don’t feel bad for her speaks volumes about the depth of the animosity she has cultivated.
The irony of Greene being on the receiving end of threats, after years of seemingly encouraging them against others, is a major focus. The contrast with her past actions is highlighted, and many express a sense of justice or karma. The comments, overall, portray a complex view of the situation, shaped by political beliefs and a sense of schadenfreude. There is also a noticeable lack of concern for her safety, suggesting the depth of the animosity she has inspired.