By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The FBI has arrested Brian J. Cole Jr., of Woodbridge, Virginia, in connection to the pipe bombs placed outside the Republican and Democratic national party headquarters on the eve of the January 6th Capitol attack. This arrest marks a breakthrough in an investigation that has puzzled law enforcement for years, using evidence such as credit card purchases, cellphone tower data, and license plate readers. Authorities are still investigating a possible motive and any connection the act may have had to the Capitol riot. The FBI and Justice Department stated the arrest was the result of a reinvigorated investigation, crediting a fresh analysis of already-collected evidence and data.
Read the original article here
The man accused of planting pipe bombs before the January 6th Capitol attack is now facing charges related to explosives, which has brought forth a flurry of reactions. It’s hard to ignore the way some news outlets are covering this, tip-toeing around the actual date of the events, referring to it as “almost 5 years ago” or “5 years ago next month.” This is immediately noticeable, and it naturally raises questions about the narrative being shaped.
Investigators are suggesting they linked this individual to the pipe bombs using a combination of evidence: surveillance footage, cell-site data, and records showing the purchase of components. The affidavit specifically mentions the alleged acquisition of things like galvanized pipes, end caps, and nine-volt connectors from various stores. These purchases, according to the allegations, continued even after the bombs were discovered. There are reports of items like a white kitchen timer and more batteries being purchased.
The timing of this revelation is also sparking a lot of discussion. The fact that the charges have been filed now, years after the events, has led many to question why it took so long. Some speculate about the possibility of political motivations, especially with the anticipation of a potential pardon, if certain individuals regain power. The suggestion that this might be a “patsy” and the potential for a presidential pardon is also a common theme in the reactions.
The discussion frequently turns towards the likelihood of a pardon, and how this could potentially undermine the legal process. There’s also the feeling that some people are getting a “free pass” due to affiliations or alliances. The idea that justice may not be served, regardless of the outcome, is another concern.
Some of the comments point to the political affiliations, and suggest that if he’s affiliated with a certain political leaning, he may be more likely to receive a pardon. Alternatively, if he’s not aligned with a particular political viewpoint, the prosecution might falter. The overall sentiment seems to be that the system is broken, and that the outcome is already predetermined.
The types of charges being brought also are being questioned. Why are they charging this as an explosives offense, rather than attempted murder or domestic terrorism? This is seen as a way of downplaying the seriousness of the situation. Some believe that the choice of charge is a strategic move, while others think it may be a consequence of the time that has passed, making it more difficult to prove intent.
Adding further complexity is the potential of misidentification. Some commenters find it strange the person is a male, and some are questioning the investigative process itself. There’s a lot of speculation about what might be the real story behind this. There are theories and suggestions that the FBI or other agencies could be involved.
Some of the remarks touch on the technical aspects of the case. For example, the fact that components were purchased with cash, and the idea that this is a rookie move and that any basic anarchist would know to avoid a paper trail. The discussion about evidence and the chain of events leading up to the charges has generated a fair amount of concern about how this case is going to play out.
The mention of Kash Patel and Bongino’s involvement in all this is a concern for a lot of people. The comment that Bongino once suggested that the FBI itself was responsible for the bombings adds another layer to this case. With the political climate in mind, this case is likely to be viewed as an attempt to restore some image.
The fact that the accused may have already been pardoned adds a layer of complexity. The presidential actions granted pardons to all individuals convicted of offenses related to the events at or near the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The question is if this is broad enough to include the charges in this case. The possibility of arguing he was included is making its way around the discussion.