By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Despite the New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s pledge to honor the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Netanyahu has declared he will visit New York regardless. Legal experts question Mamdani’s legal authority to arrest an international leader, with the United States, Israel, and Russia not recognizing the ICC, and the UN providing immunity for visiting diplomats. The Mayor-elect’s pro-Palestinian stance has drawn criticism, although his views resonated with progressive voters. Additionally, the U.S. doesn’t recognize the ICC, Netanyahu is allied with a former U.S. President, and the U.N. headquarters provides immunity for diplomats.
Read the original article here
Mamdani won’t stop Netanyahu from visiting NYC, Israeli leader vows.
The core of this conversation revolves around a hypothetical: what happens if the Mayor of New York City, Mamdani, were to act on the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu? The consensus seems to be that it’s a non-starter. Many point out the practical limitations, with the primary one being that the United States is not a signatory to the ICC. This means the US government, and by extension, local law enforcement in NYC, wouldn’t be legally obligated to honor the warrant.
Mamdani has pledged to honor the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes in Israel’s siege of Gaza.
The sentiment that Mamdani could, or even should, arrest Netanyahu is largely dismissed as unrealistic. There’s a recognition of the significant legal and political hurdles. The role of the federal government in matters of international diplomacy is emphasized, suggesting that any attempt by NYC authorities to arrest a visiting world leader would be swiftly countered. The potential for a major diplomatic crisis is acknowledged, with various commentators highlighting the disruption this could cause to the UN and international relations. Some consider the UN would be destabilized and diplomatic purposes undermined.
Mamdani won’t stop Netanyahu from visiting NYC, Israeli leader vows.
There’s a recurring theme of skepticism about the practicality of the mayor’s stance. Some see it as political posturing, perhaps designed to appeal to a specific segment of his voter base. It’s often viewed as a promise he simply cannot keep, and some people feel he is being dishonest. The comments hint at a sense of frustration, with some expressing disappointment, as well as a degree of political naivety.
Mamdani has pledged to honor the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes in Israel’s siege of Gaza.
Several commenters express strong opinions about Netanyahu himself, acknowledging the “alleged war crimes” in Gaza. The ICC’s warrant is, for some, a legitimate instrument for holding individuals accountable for serious transgressions. There’s a desire for justice and a sense of moral outrage at alleged atrocities, with many calling for fair trials and lifelong sentences. Despite that, the limitations imposed by US law are still taken into consideration.
Mamdani won’t stop Netanyahu from visiting NYC, Israeli leader vows.
The discussion touches on the role of the mayor of a major city in international affairs. Some see this as overstepping boundaries, suggesting that local politics should remain focused on local issues such as affordability and infrastructure. The idea of the mayor of a US city significantly impacting global politics is also seen as a bit fanciful. The conversation underscores the complexities of balancing local authority with international law and diplomatic protocols.
Mamdani has pledged to honor the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes in Israel’s siege of Gaza.
The conversation touches on the nuances of international relations and legal complexities. While the ICC warrant has validity in signatory countries, the US’s non-membership puts it outside the legal jurisdiction. Also, the principle of diplomatic immunity further complicates matters. The article reveals a general agreement that arresting a visiting head of state would create a serious international incident.
Mamdani won’t stop Netanyahu from visiting NYC, Israeli leader vows.
There is a sense of both the desire for justice and the reality of legal and political constraints. There’s a general sense that even if individuals believe in the merits of the ICC’s case, the mayor of New York City is not the proper venue for acting on this warrant. The focus returns to the legal and logistical difficulties of the situation. The conversation ends with a clear consensus: Mamdani’s words likely won’t translate into any actual action.