By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Leaked details from a classified US national security strategy reveal the Trump administration’s plans to encourage four additional countries to leave the European Union, echoing the “Make Europe Great Again” slogan. The strategy reportedly identifies Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Poland as targets, expressing concerns about “civilisational erasure” due to immigration and multiculturalism. Furthermore, the document suggests forming a new “Core Five” forum (C5) comprised of the US, China, India, Japan, and Russia, potentially overshadowing the G7. This strategy aims to support entities that promote national sovereignty and traditional European values while remaining aligned with US interests.
Read the original article here
Leaked files ‘show US wants to persuade four nations to leave EU’ – this is quite the headline, isn’t it? It’s the kind of thing that makes you sit up and take notice. The implication, of course, is that the United States is actively trying to destabilize the European Union by encouraging member states to break away. That’s a pretty bold move, especially from a supposed ally. And frankly, it’s a bit unsettling.
Considering Austria, Hungary, Italy, and Poland – the nations reportedly targeted – this paints a picture of deliberate maneuvering. The article suggests this isn’t about economics. That points towards something else entirely, maybe something strategic, or perhaps just to sow discord. And it’s not just a matter of whispers; the tone of the comments suggests a deep sense of betrayal among those who see the US as a close ally. This is not the behavior of a friend.
From a different point of view, it seems like the people writing these comments feel a sense of embarrassment for what’s happening. The idea of the US working to undermine its allies and actively supporting a foreign agenda is a difficult pill to swallow. It leads to harsh accusations, labeling the former head of state as a “Russian plant” and a traitor. This is intense language, but it reflects the level of frustration and anger that this situation has generated. There’s a feeling that the US has, in some ways, become an adversary.
It’s interesting to note how some commenters are discussing the potential consequences. They’re talking about the long-term impact on the US’s standing in the world and its influence. The suggestion of a new global power structure, with the US sidelined and the focus on a “Core Five” that includes Russia and China, is particularly striking. The idea of being reduced to a colony of Russia, and the need for the rest of the world to take steps to deal with America – it’s a stark contrast to the historical roles of the US.
The question of why these specific countries were targeted is an obvious one. One commenter noted that getting Hungary out of the EU would actually strengthen the EU. This suggests the motivations behind this could be varied, ranging from a calculated move to weaken the EU overall, to playing specific nations against each other for leverage. It’s a complex game with high stakes. And there’s a certain feeling of disillusionment, as if the foundations of international relations are being shaken.
The comments also reflect a deep sense of anger directed towards the former administration and the Republican Party. There’s a belief that they’ve been compromised, and that they’re actively working against the interests of the United States and its allies. The calls for those responsible to be held accountable, even imprisoned, shows the depth of the outrage. It’s as though this situation represents a betrayal of core values and a fundamental shift in the nature of American politics.
There is a sense of disbelief that this is happening, as though it’s something out of a spy movie. The idea of a foreign power using a former head of state to destabilize another region is truly a dramatic situation. The comments reveal the gravity of the situation, showing how something like this could affect the perception of the United States.
There is also a sense of frustration, and that the situation has come about because of the actions of a few individuals, who are perceived as being driven by a combination of ideology and personal gain. The idea that “the western alliance is done” reflects the severity of the perceived damage. And there’s a sense that the world is changing, and that the US may no longer be at the center.
Ultimately, the comments point to a conclusion that the leaked files, if true, represent a betrayal of the US’s stated values. It’s a situation that has the potential to reshape the global landscape and challenge the established order. The comments highlight the need for transparency, accountability, and a reassessment of the US’s role in the world. It’s a wake-up call to the seriousness of the situation, and to the potential for lasting damage to international relations.