By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Arizona Senator Mark Kelly accused President Trump of threatening his life for speaking the truth, which Kelly believes is an attempt to silence him. Kelly also expressed concern over a recent military strike in the Caribbean that may have resulted in the killing of survivors, calling for an investigation. The Senator further stated that he has zero confidence in Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Kelly’s comments come after Trump’s call for Kelly and others to be executed, a statement that has resulted in death threats against the Senator and his wife.
Read the original article here
Kelly compares Hegseth to ‘a 12 year-old’ playing Army; ‘It is embarrassing’ – a sentiment that really captures the feeling, doesn’t it? It’s like we’ve all collectively witnessed this shift from being concerned to a kind of grim fascination. The initial shock of something like this happening has long worn off. It’s almost expected now.
The comparison to a child playing army feels apt, doesn’t it? The childish obsession with weapons and the lack of understanding of the consequences of their actions paints a clear picture. The comment about “speedrunning our way to Nuremberg Trials” is a stark, albeit dramatic, way of acknowledging the gravity of the situation. It really highlights the potential repercussions.
The analogy to kids who wore camo pants to school, played too much Call of Duty, and were obsessed with weapons certainly hits home. It’s a type, a caricature even, but one that feels relevant to the discussion. And the musical interjection, even if a joke, does underline the feeling of contempt that some have for this kind of behavior. The whole thing feels… well, kind of ridiculous.
The underlying concern about the kind of people who are entrusted with power is quite important. The idea that barely functional alcoholics are in positions of authority is incredibly disturbing. The image of generals being juggled around to accommodate someone like this is particularly alarming. It’s a reminder of the compromises that are made, the standards that are lowered.
The mention of Kelly as a potential VP candidate is an interesting aside. It speaks to a certain frustration with the current state of politics. The idea of someone with his background and experience, someone “tough and no-nonsense” feels appealing to many, a contrast to what is perceived as weakness or incompetence. The idea of seeing him in a debate with certain figures is a very interesting thought.
The observation that “it is not embarrassing when everyone around you are 12-year-olds” is a cynical, yet perhaps accurate, point. In an environment where immaturity is the norm, the concept of being embarrassed loses its meaning. It highlights a dangerous reality, where accountability is diminished.
The question of whether charges are coming is a serious one. The potential for war crimes charges adds a layer of moral weight to the situation. Whether the law will be applied fairly and to all involved is a pressing matter, and the uncertainty is very stressful.
The image of Hegseth running off, firing finger guns, and giggling feels like a disturbingly accurate portrayal of how he might react to such a description. It’s a potent illustration of the disconnect between the perception of self and the reality of their actions. It reinforces the idea of someone playing a role, rather than taking things seriously.
The idea of being able to shame them into acting in accordance with the law is an optimistic one, but the comments point out that this is not effective. The reference to the Nuremberg trials further illustrates the point that accountability and justice are not always guaranteed, and certain people will be protected.
The discussion about the potential for those who are in power to escape consequences is a depressing one. The fact that competent and evil individuals might be the ones saved is a chilling thought. This touches upon a real and relevant concern, and it creates a feeling of unease.
The story about the person from middle school who was “obsessed to an unhealthy degree with weapons” is a telling one. It gives a glimpse into the potential mindset of someone drawn to this kind of behavior, highlighting the dangers of such an obsession. The edit about being nice to them to not be on “their list” is a very chilling reflection on the reality of being vulnerable to those people.
The comments about school shooter and rich sociopath vibes, and the firecracker and frog comment, are an unsettling picture. This kind of discussion feeds into a general sense of distrust and anxiety. They create a very scary image.
The anecdote about the kid with the basement firing range is unsettling. The questions about using certain items as ringtones are darkly humorous, but they also raise questions about ethics and propriety. This kind of stuff is not just embarrassing, but is dangerous.
The comments acknowledging that military personnel will follow unlawful orders to kill is very disturbing. It raises concerns about moral responsibility and the potential for atrocities. The fact that it is a common observation is very concerning.
The suggestion that Kelly is considering a future presidential bid and the resulting analysis of his qualifications is an interesting point. It speaks to a desire for competent and decisive leadership. It would be a dramatic change.
The assertion that shame won’t work is an important point. They only respond to life in prison. A focus on accountability and justice is very necessary.
The discussion about how some people treat outrage as fuel is sadly on point. The idea that these people are impervious to public opinion, and thrive on it, speaks volumes about the current political climate. The point about historical forgiveness of war crimes is a somber reminder of the limitations of justice.
The discussion about social dynamics and the experience of females is a very important one, especially when you are dealing with people who are “outcasts” or “weirdos” – be very careful and protect yourself.
The idea of a high school pep rally with all the people mentioned together is darkly humorous, yet also incredibly disturbing. It underscores the bizarre nature of the current political environment.
The comment about addicts’ emotional maturity is a very insightful one. It sheds light on why these people, regardless of age, act the way that they do. It gives a bit of understanding as to why these people may be playing army.