By Matt Underwood Justice Dept. Now Said to Be Reviewing 5.2 Million Pages of Epstein Files – this announcement immediately sets off alarm bells, doesn’t it? It’s a staggering amount of documentation, especially when considering the initial narrative that these files either didn’t exist or weren’t readily accessible. The shift in story, from absence to needing time for review, feels deeply problematic.
A huge scandal is unfolding right before our eyes, and the question that begs to be asked is, “Why are they just *now* reviewing these files?” If these documents truly existed, and a law mandated their release, the delays and explanations offered simply don’t add up. This smells like a classic delay tactic, a way to drag out the process, hoping public interest wanes or the political climate shifts. The public deserves transparency, and federal laws were clearly broken.
The very idea of a “review” feels like a stalling mechanism, raising the obvious question: what exactly is being scrutinized? Are they looking for incriminating evidence to bury, or are they genuinely trying to understand the scope of the material? The fact that a fraction of the documents has already led to new allegations suggests there’s a lot more hidden within these 5.2 million pages, that perhaps even the most cynical amongst us couldn’t have imagined.
The implication of all of this is vast. The suggestion that these files somehow materialized from a desk, then disappeared, only to reappear in need of review, is simply not credible. The idea that this is all just a coincidence is, frankly, insulting. It’s almost as if the strategy is to drown the public in paperwork, making it difficult to discern the truly damaging revelations.
One can’t help but wonder about the scale of the files. The sheer volume – 5.2 million pages – is almost unfathomable. It’s a mountain of information, and the idea that it all needs to be reviewed is both time consuming and creates an opportunity for obfuscation. It’s a classic cover-up strategy: inundate with information to hide the important details. The files were meant to be released weeks ago, and the fact that less than 2% has been released so far speaks volumes.
The public has a right to know what’s in these documents. There is a sense of indignation. The legal requirement was clear, and the delay in releasing the files, or even releasing them fully is unacceptable. This feels like an assault on transparency.
The amount of documents is consistently reported to be growing, this is concerning. The feeling that these delays and evasions will lead to nothing but further obfuscation is understandable. The questions are many: What’s being hidden? Who is involved? How will this finally see the light of day?
The use of “reviewing” is most likely, a clever euphemism. It seems that the goal is simply to delay, redact and cover-up. The scale of the whole thing is hard to understand; it will be very difficult to navigate the mountain of documents, even if everything is released. The feeling is that the whole story is just too ridiculous for words.
The American people deserve full access to these documents, the law is the law. And the repeated defiance of that law should have repercussions. Transparency is the only way forward. The public’s interest, and the pursuit of justice, demands nothing less.