By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a federal court hearing in Eugene, a judge halted proceedings when an ICE detainee testified she had not eaten since being awakened at 2 a.m. for transport. The judge, appalled by the detainee’s treatment, ordered the woman to be fed immediately and expressed strong disapproval to the Department of Justice. Ultimately, the judge ordered the woman’s immediate release, citing that more than 90 days had passed since her deportation order, which violated immigration law. The woman had been detained by ICE following a recent arrest and had previously been unaware of her deportation order from 2017.
Read the original article here
‘Absolutely Appalled’: Judge Blasts ICE for Failing to Feed Detainee Before Court
It’s truly disheartening to see the level of disregard exhibited towards a human being in this situation. Judge Aiken’s reaction, describing herself as “absolutely appalled,” perfectly encapsulates the sentiment. The core issue here is not just the lack of a meal; it’s the blatant disrespect for a detainee’s basic needs and, consequently, their human dignity. The fact that this woman was roused at 2 a.m., transported, and then expected to participate in a crucial legal proceeding without sustenance is simply unacceptable.
The judge’s offer to share her own lunch speaks volumes about her understanding of the situation. It highlights the stark contrast between her own sense of decency and the apparent indifference of the ICE officers. This wasn’t a minor oversight; it was a fundamental failure to treat a person in custody with even the most basic consideration. Judge Aiken rightly emphasized that this kind of treatment “should never happen” and that it “needs to go all the way up the chain.” This is not just a matter of protocol; it’s a moral imperative.
The details of the case reveal a pattern of behavior that suggests a broader problem within the system. The 22-year-old detainee, identified only by her initials, was arrested early in the morning, held without adequate access to legal counsel, and then moved across state lines. Her situation brings to light some troubling questions regarding ICE’s methods of operation. This is compounded by the fact that the woman was brought into the court without having eaten. The judge’s eventual order to release the detainee, citing the expiration of the 90-day period, further exposes the flaws within ICE’s detention practices and how these practices are enforced.
It’s difficult not to be disturbed by the suggestion that ICE acts with the same impunity as the Nazi SS. While it is strong, the comparison underscores the gravity of the situation and the deep-seated concerns about the actions of this organization. When a judge feels compelled to halt a hearing and offer her own food to a detainee, it’s a clear indication of a significant breakdown in the system. The lack of food is just the tip of the iceberg, and it exposes a deeper indifference to the people in the system’s custody.
Judge Aiken’s frustration isn’t merely about the absence of breakfast; it’s a reflection of the systemic issues within ICE. The fact that the detainee was detained without any reasonable suspicion, and then subjected to these conditions, strongly reinforces the arguments by her lawyers. The judge’s order for immediate release, combined with her strong words about the agency’s behavior, sends a powerful message. It also highlights the urgent need for accountability within the system.
The case also raises serious questions about the role of the Department of Justice. As Judge Aiken pointed out, this mistreatment requires action up the chain of command. In this situation, the Department of Justice’s role is essential. The message is to ensure such treatment does not continue. This incident isn’t a singular event, and the need for stricter guidelines is clear.
The circumstances surrounding the detainee’s arrest and detention are deeply unsettling. It’s difficult to accept the fact that a basic need such as food would be denied. The judge is right, we should treat people with dignity. There needs to be a fundamental reassessment of how these individuals are treated.
The judge’s efforts to ensure the detainee’s well-being, even offering her own food, stand in stark contrast to the apparent lack of concern on the part of the ICE officers. The fact that the judge released her indicates that the law may have been violated. It’s imperative that the legal system hold these officers accountable. If there are no consequences for such behavior, it is bound to continue.
Ultimately, this situation is a grim reminder that a society is measured by how it treats its most vulnerable members. The judge’s actions, and her outrage, should serve as a wake-up call. It’s time for a serious overhaul of the way detainees are treated and held accountable for their treatment. The system isn’t functioning properly, and it’s essential that these issues are addressed with urgency.