By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a final warning, Henry Kissinger predicted Japan would pursue nuclear weapons. Kissinger, in a 2023 interview, estimated Japan would become a nuclear power within five years. Chinese experts share similar concerns, estimating Japan could develop such weapons in under three years, given their technical capabilities and political motivation. Furthermore, recent statements by Japanese officials hint at a potential shift in Japan’s non-nuclear principles, suggesting a growing interest in nuclear armament.
Read the original article here
Chinese nuclear experts believe Japan could build nukes in less than 3 years, a statement that immediately sparks a wave of considerations. It’s not just a technical assessment; it’s a statement loaded with geopolitical implications. The core idea is simple: Japan possesses the technological prowess to develop nuclear weapons. They have the infrastructure, the expertise, and the raw materials – or, at least, the means to acquire them. The question, therefore, isn’t about capability, but about intent and the timeline to achieve that intent.
The consensus here seems to be that a three-year timeframe is, to put it mildly, a significant overestimate. Many feel that Japan could, if it chose to, develop operational nuclear weapons far more quickly. Weeks, months, or perhaps a year, seem like more realistic estimations, given their existing nuclear energy program and advanced technological capabilities. Some sources even suggest that contingency plans for rapid nuclearization have existed within Japan for decades. The United States, after all, developed the bomb in the 1940s without the benefit of the advanced technology available today. The consensus seems to be that Japan’s capacity is likely to produce an operational warhead within a year, if not less.
The debate also extends to the design of these weapons. A gun-type fission bomb, similar to the one used on Hiroshima, is considered relatively simple to construct. More complex thermonuclear weapons, on the other hand, require a different level of sophistication. Japan’s focus would likely be on fission weapons, given their relative ease of production and sufficient deterrent capability.
The context of this discussion must also include the actions of other nations. The implication is that other nations, such as South Korea, Canada, and even Iran, could similarly develop nuclear weapons if they chose to do so. This underscores the broader issue of nuclear proliferation and the delicate balance of power in the world.
Furthermore, there’s a strong sentiment that the question of Japan’s nuclear ambitions boils down to more than just technical capabilities. It’s also intertwined with Japan’s security concerns and its relationship with other major powers, including the United States, China, and Russia. The changing global landscape, including the actions and rhetoric of these major players, may very well influence Japan’s decisions. The possibility of a shift in the world order is an unspoken but critical element in this discussion.
Interestingly, it is observed that Japan’s existing infrastructure, including its nuclear power plants, space program (with its ICBM-capable rockets), and advanced research capabilities, all provide a foundation for rapid nuclear weapon development. This makes the argument that Japan is already a “virtual nuclear weapon state.” They possess the knowledge, materials, and infrastructure, all they need is the political will to assemble a weapon.
The political considerations are also present. Japan’s constitution currently prohibits the possession of nuclear weapons. However, the world is a changed place, and these constraints might be reevaluated if Japan feels its security is threatened. The reactions of the Japanese people to the idea of a nuclear arsenal, considering their history as the only nation to experience nuclear attacks, must be taken into account. But ultimately, it is a calculation of deterrence and the need for self-defense that may drive any change of policy.
Some suggest that the world is more dangerous now than it was before the COVID pandemic, a sentiment shared by many. With some major players appearing to disrupt global stability, it’s not surprising that Japan might consider bolstering its defense capabilities, including the acquisition of nuclear weapons, or at least a rapid path to get there.
The discussion concludes with an interesting point. Some people believe that Japan should be developing them because of the global situation. A nuclear-armed Japan could provide stability and serve as a deterrent against aggressors in the region. The assurance of mutual destruction could promote peace. The fact that the Japanese government has a very detailed plan, even if it has never been enacted, is common knowledge.
Ultimately, the assertion that Japan could build nukes in less than three years, as suggested by Chinese nuclear experts, isn’t just about the timeline. It’s a statement about Japan’s capabilities, its geopolitical context, and the choices it might make in a rapidly changing world. The world is watching.