By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Far-right activist Laura Loomer has been granted a credential and a desk at the Pentagon, causing a stir of mixed reactions. Loomer celebrated her access to the Department of Defense headquarters, previously occupied by Washington Post reporters. Reactions ranged from sarcastic well-wishes to criticisms, with some journalists expressing concern over the implications of this change. The event triggered commentary across social media regarding the state of journalism and national security.
Read the original article here
Internet reactions to Laura Loomer getting a desk at the Pentagon seem to be overwhelmingly negative, and honestly, who can blame them? It’s like the internet collectively inhaled and then exhaled a sigh of disbelief. The initial reaction, judging by the tone, is one of shock and incredulity. The phrase “ARE YOU FUCKIN KIDDIN ME????” pretty much sums it up. It seems like a significant portion of the online world is struggling to process how this happened and what it signifies.
The qualifications of Laura Loomer are a major point of contention. Several comments question what she could possibly bring to the table in a role at the Pentagon. There’s a lot of head-scratching about her expertise and what she’s qualified to do, with some resorting to sarcasm and making pointed jokes. One user humorously inquired about the type of job she might perform at the Pentagon, seemingly inferring that the role is more about loyalty than skill.
The association with the former president is an unavoidable element of the online discourse. The general sentiment is that this move is more about political connections than merit. There’s an undercurrent of frustration and disappointment, with many seeing this as another example of what they perceive to be the decline of standards and values in politics. The references to the “Trump orbit” and “shagging the boss” highlight the perception that this is a reward for personal loyalty rather than a strategic appointment.
The mention of her past antics, such as handcuffing herself to Twitter’s HQ, further fuels the negativity. These actions are viewed as performative stunts, not qualifications for a position of importance. The comments also question the motives behind her actions.
The perceived implications for the military and national security are also a recurring theme. The comments suggest that this move is a deliberate attempt to undermine the credibility of the institution, or at least, the respect people have for the Pentagon. Comparisons to a “pit bull guard dog” and suggestions that she’s a “mouthpiece for the president” underscore this concern.
The online discussion veers into political territory, with comments about the state of the country. This includes a clear partisan divide, with some expressing strong negative opinions on Republicans and their motivations. The phrase “Republicans HATE America” is a particularly strong statement, reflecting a deep level of distrust and animosity. In the context of the situation, the idea that a political party wants to “destroy America” is pretty significant.
The overall tone is one of both amusement and dismay. The internet seems to be processing this news with a mix of disbelief, sarcasm, and genuine concern. The idea of the Pentagon as a “toxic hazard” and the call for journalists to avoid it speaks volumes about the level of distrust. The phrase “how about you veterans… ya’ll proud of how it’s going..?” suggests disappointment in the leadership.
The visual descriptions of Laura Loomer are harsh, adding a layer of personal judgment to the criticism. It seems like the internet is actively trying to determine whether the news is real or something manipulated to make her look weirder than she already appears, which suggests an inability to take her and the whole matter seriously.
In short, the internet’s response to Laura Loomer getting a desk at the Pentagon is far from welcoming. This is the internet at its finest, or perhaps its most cynical. The online conversation paints a picture of a nation deeply divided, and this appointment seems to have poured gasoline on the fire.