By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Girlguiding has announced that trans girls and young women, as well as others not recorded female at birth, will no longer be able to join as new members. This decision follows legal advice prompted by the Supreme Court ruling on gender earlier this year and its implications on the Equality Act. The organization emphasized its commitment to inclusion and plans to support marginalized groups through a new taskforce. While there will be no immediate changes for current members, the ruling effectively restricts membership to girls and young women as defined by biological sex.
Read the original article here
Trans girls banned from joining Girlguiding. The news that Girlguiding in the UK is restricting trans girls from joining is, frankly, disheartening. It feels like watching progress disappear before our eyes. The situation seems to have been brought about by legal action, primarily spearheaded by groups like *For Women Scotland* and, notably, with funding from individuals like J.K. Rowling. Considering that Girlguiding, at least in the UK context, now appears more conservative on this front than even Scouting America – well, that’s a concerning turn of events.
Apparently, according to statements from Girlguiding themselves, this decision was largely forced upon them. It wasn’t a choice they necessarily wanted to make. They seemed to prefer continuing their inclusive practices, but were pressured by external forces. This situation starkly contrasts with the inclusive policies of organizations like Girl Guides of Canada, which explicitly welcomes trans girls and non-binary individuals. It’s hard not to notice the difference in approaches, and frankly, it highlights the influence of external pressures.
Girlguiding’s apparent preference to include trans girls, as suggested by their statements, is overshadowed by a Supreme Court ruling. This legal decision didn’t necessarily invalidate the concept of trans identity, but it did challenge the wording of existing legislation, essentially creating a loophole. This situation provides a pathway for those with bigoted agendas to force their will upon inclusive organizations. It’s a tactic designed to punish children for the beliefs of others, and it’s a deeply disappointing one. This isn’t just about the Girlguiding organization; it’s a reflection of how hate groups exploit legal frameworks.
The irony here is palpable. Organizations like Girl Guides of Canada have found successful ways to integrate trans girls. They have clearly stated guidelines and a commitment to inclusivity. The fact that the UK organization is not allowed to do the same underscores the impact of outside interference. And it is this very interference that is so frustrating.
This is happening because hateful bigots are forcing it to, punishing kids for their agenda. They’re using the law to make their point. It’s a sad reality when inclusivity becomes a battleground, and it emphasizes how the true goal is not about safety, but about hurting a minority. It’s about setting strict gender segregation. Cruelty is the point. These bans are never about protecting girls because they never go after the root causes.
The focus seems to be narrowly directed, and this raises questions about the motivations behind these actions. It’s almost as if the primary objective is to exclude and to cause harm, rather than genuinely ensuring safety and well-being. It is just cruelty and that is how it should be addressed.
The fact that these restrictions are happening is really disheartening. And while it’s understandable that people may have varying viewpoints on gender identity, the fact remains that a group of people is being marginalized and excluded, and that’s not something to be celebrated. People will keep telling us that all of this isn’t about bigotry. I’m sorry but I think some things in general should be separated by biology to create a safe space for woman. I’m not saying this is right but it’s how I feel.
The situation in Canada, where there’s a consistent inclusion statement, illustrates an alternative path. There, organizations are structured to welcome girls and women — cisgender and transgender — and non-binary people. This stands in stark contrast to the UK’s trajectory and highlights the choices organizations are making.
The bigger picture is, unfortunately, what we see here. It wasn’t really about sports. It wasn’t about the wedding cake, or the bathrooms. It’s about hurting those at the bottom. That’s all these people stand for. Children only need protecting when they are cis type of bullshit. Just why? Why be so horrible to the poor kids? They just want to be who they are, there’s not even any bullshit excuses around being “fair” here… it’s just cruelty. And the world is righting itself.
The implications of this ban are far-reaching. It seems to have a long-term impact on the very essence of Girlguiding. The goal of providing a safe and inclusive space for all girls is no longer a reality. This isn’t just about Girlguiding; it’s about the broader societal implications of discrimination and the pressure to conform.
The forced change in the UK is a stark contrast to what we find in Canada. It highlights the influence of external pressures that have seemingly forced Girlguiding’s hand. It’s a sad reality when inclusivity becomes a battleground, and it’s a deeply disappointing one. And, as an American, we’re not the only country with fucked up priorities.
It’s hard not to question the motives of those pushing for this ban. It’s not about ensuring safety; it’s about harming a minority. It’s a demonstration of the lengths to which some people will go to exclude those they deem different, and that’s just a tragic thing to witness.