By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Germany’s parliament has approved a new voluntary military service program for 18-year-olds, a response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Chancellor Merz’s aim to strengthen the nation’s military. Starting January 2026, all 18-year-olds will receive a questionnaire to gauge their interest in joining the armed forces, with mandatory forms for men and voluntary ones for women. The move has sparked protests, as many young Germans oppose the new law, citing concerns about military training and the prospect of war. The Bundestag’s decision follows a trend among European countries to revamp military service, mirroring similar initiatives like France’s voluntary training program.
Read the original article here
Germany votes to bring back voluntary military service programme for 18-year-olds, a move that is generating a lot of discussion and, frankly, some pretty strong feelings. The idea is to beef up the Bundeswehr, the German armed forces, but without going back to the old system of full conscription right away. This feels like a carefully considered middle ground, offering young people the option to serve without making it compulsory. The word “voluntary” is absolutely key here.
It’s worth remembering that Germany did have mandatory military service until 2011, which was then officially “paused,” not completely scrapped. So, the concept isn’t entirely new. The current system already relies on voluntary service, so the core question then becomes, what is really changing? This is where the new law comes in. From January 2026, all 18-year-olds in Germany will receive a questionnaire asking if they’re interested in joining the military. **The questionnaire is mandatory for men but voluntary for women.** It is important to note that many young Germans are either against this new law or are skeptical of it.
This approach is likely a strategic move. It’s often harder to sell the idea of immediate, widespread conscription. Starting with voluntary participation could be seen as a way to test the waters and assess public sentiment. A military service program can also serve as a *social welfare* machine in a period where the German economy is slowing down. There are several reasons this could be true. Military service could offer new skills and training to young people as well as provide a temporary income.
The prospect of spending time in barracks, learning drills, and being trained for combat isn’t universally welcomed. Many young people are concerned about being “locked up” and the potential for participating in war. It is not necessarily wrong to ask whether Germany is prepared for a potential conflict, especially given the current global climate.
The question of why young people aren’t grateful for their nation’s defense is worth considering. The ability to make their own choices about their life is a luxury many people would not have. To be in a place where such a thing is even considered is something to be grateful for.
The fact that the questionnaire is mandatory for men and voluntary for women has sparked some debate about gender equality. The German constitution currently only allows for the conscription of men. Changing this would require significant legal hurdles, including a two-thirds majority in both houses of parliament. This creates a challenging situation, especially given historical perceptions about gender roles in military service. Some might see it as a reflection of existing gender inequalities, while others might argue that it’s a necessary consideration within the constraints of the constitution.
The new law itself is viewed by many as a stopgap measure, with the possibility of mandatory service being considered down the line if voluntary recruitment falls short. This makes the new law a “PR move” with the goal of increasing recruitment in the German Armed Forces. They are essentially delaying the hard decisions until they know whether a voluntary program will yield sufficient results. The concern is that if the voluntary program doesn’t work out, the option to make it mandatory is still available.
Critics have also pointed out logistical challenges, such as the Bundeswehr’s current ability to accommodate a sudden influx of recruits. Furthermore, the handling of the questionnaire and the focus on this aspect has left many people feeling like this entire process is “a shit show”.
Of course, the purpose of a military is to defend against threats. In the current geopolitical environment, the most pressing threat to Germany and Europe as a whole is Russia. This is the root of the issue. A strong military is a deterrent, and a well-prepared force is more likely to prevent war than to invite it. This is why having a strong military is such a crucial factor in both current and future global politics.
The core question revolves around the balance between individual freedom and national defense. Some view this law as a step in the right direction to keep the European Union’s values and way of life. Others see it as a potential infringement on individual liberties.