By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The French navy responded to multiple drone incursions over a sensitive military site in Brittany, France. The Île Longue submarine base, which houses nuclear submarines critical to France’s defense, was targeted. Military officials reported the detection of five drones on Thursday night, prompting navy troops to open fire. The status of the drones, whether they were successfully downed, is currently unknown.
Read the original article here
French navy troops in charge of protecting the base opened fire, the report said. It seems the French Navy has found itself in a rather intriguing situation, firing upon what were described as drones buzzing around a nuclear submarine base. The AFP report definitely paints a picture of heightened security, but the lack of clarity on whether the drones were actually brought down leaves us with more questions than answers. It’s almost like a real-life game of cat and mouse, or perhaps a high-stakes guessing game.
It’s fascinating to consider what the intention was behind these incursions. Were they merely observational, or were there more sinister motives at play? And if these were indeed drones, why haven’t we seen a clear outcome? If they were just typical UAVs, you’d think they would’ve been brought down, right? The fact that the report is unclear about whether the drones were shot down is probably the key point.
The debate of whether the buzzing objects were drones or something more mysterious, like UAPs, is immediately sparked. It’s easy to get caught up in the speculation, and it’s certainly tempting to jump to conclusions, especially when sensitive military installations are involved. However, it’s worth remembering the simple definition: Unidentified. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Given the sensitive nature of the location – a nuclear submarine base – it’s understandable that security is paramount. The fact that the French Navy felt compelled to open fire suggests they were taking the threat very seriously. That the response might seem muted to some is perhaps a reflection of the challenges in dealing with this new frontier of defense. The fact that they shot at the drones gives away a lot of information, like this being an important site and their ability to respond.
The effectiveness of current anti-drone technologies is another aspect worth considering. There’s a wide range of options out there, from laser systems and jamming devices to net guns, and even the “smash them with drones” approach. The choice of weapon really comes down to the context and the nature of the threat. Is it a war zone? Is it a civilian area?
The Ukrainian example, specifically the AI-driven Sky Sentinel turret, is a powerful illustration of how the technology is evolving. This is essentially an automated turret, which takes it one step closer to making choices and shooting at things without human input. It would seem like it’s close to becoming automated, but the current weakness is the possible risk of collateral damage.
The problem, though, as many are pointing out, is that effectively dealing with drones cheaply and consistently can be tricky. Most militaries don’t have the right weapons on hand or ready to go. You don’t want to waste expensive ammunition on something that’s cheap and can’t do anything, but the lasers are costly, so just fly drones and destroy the drones, which the U.S. military is apparently doing.
It also raises the question of training and tactics. Hitting a small, fast-moving target like a drone with conventional weapons is challenging, and it’s even more difficult if the personnel in charge aren’t well-trained in those specific techniques. Depending on the size of the drones, they would be difficult to hit with conventional arms.
It is worth noting that some military ships don’t have IFF, and will shoot at whatever is considered a missile heading for the ship.
It’s also worth thinking about what it takes to actually send a warning to the people sending these drones. A shot or two may be unnoticeable.
Ultimately, the incident at the French nuclear submarine base serves as a reminder that the world of drone technology is constantly evolving. It also reinforces how important the ability to defend a country’s most sensitive assets is. Perhaps we will learn more, perhaps not. It’s clear that the game is on, and the players are still figuring out the rules.