By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a renewed effort to safeguard children, France is considering a ban on social media access for children under 15, with the draft law aiming for implementation by September of next year. The proposed legislation, backed by President Emmanuel Macron, addresses concerns about the various risks associated with excessive screen time, including exposure to inappropriate content and cyber-harassment. The draft law includes two articles, one prohibiting online platforms from providing social media services to those under 15 and the other banning mobile phone use in secondary schools. This follows Australia’s recent social media ban on under 16s.
Read the original article here
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the response is, well, it’s a mixed bag, to put it mildly. There’s a definite sense that this proposal is stirring up a lot of opinions, anxieties, and even some cynicism. The core idea – limiting access to social media for kids under 15 – seems to have the potential to spark both hope and a fair amount of skepticism.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and one of the most immediate concerns is the practicality. How, exactly, would this be enforced? Some people are already predicting workarounds, with children finding ways to bypass restrictions. The internet, after all, is a vast and ever-evolving space, and young people are often incredibly resourceful when it comes to technology. There’s a feeling that this might be a battle that’s difficult to win, and the energy could be better spent elsewhere.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and many are worried about the potential for government overreach. The idea of having to provide government-issued IDs for age verification to use the internet has raised red flags for a lot of people. It’s seen as a step towards greater surveillance and control, with the guise of protecting children used as a smokescreen. The echoes of “Think of the children!” being the rallying cry for a range of policies are definitely being heard.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the proposed ban brings to the surface fundamental questions about personal liberty and freedom. The idea of “Liberté, égalité, fraternité” – freedom, equality, and brotherhood – is invoked, with a sense that this kind of restriction goes against those core values. The internet, in its early days, was often celebrated as a space of unprecedented freedom. This ban, and any restrictions it entails, are seen as a step backwards.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the debate quickly becomes broader. The focus shifts to the responsibilities of parents and society as a whole. Some people believe that the real problem isn’t access to social media, but a lack of guidance and education for children on how to navigate the online world. They argue that teaching kids about the benefits and dangers of social media is key, and that simply banning it is an oversimplification.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the discussion delves into the impact of social media itself. Many participants express concerns about its detrimental effects on mental health and communication. Social media is seen by some as “poison,” contributing to anxiety, depression, and a decline in genuine human connection. There’s a sense that something needs to be done about the pervasive influence of these platforms, and the proposed ban is viewed as at least a step in the right direction.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the focus extends to a range of potential solutions. Some voices are calling for stricter regulation of advertising, particularly gambling ads and those that target children. Others advocate for making social media companies more accountable for the content that appears on their platforms, including holding them liable for algorithmic promotion of harmful or misleading information. The conversation goes beyond a simple ban and explores a complex landscape of possible remedies.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the concerns about privacy resurface. There is a strong feeling that the proposal could be a way to gather personal information and erode anonymity online. The call for anonymity is rooted in the belief that everyone should have the right to share information without being exposed. This is seen by some as not really about protecting kids and more about harvesting personal information.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and there is a desire for creative solutions that tackle the underlying issues. Some suggested that the ban for children might only be a start, with some participants suggesting the ban also apply to other age brackets. Another suggestion proposes the regulation of advertising revenues and business models very heavily. This also includes the banning of data sales for minors.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the effectiveness of such a ban also comes into question. Some suggest banning smartphones for everyone under 18 and forcing them to use older devices. The need to “try” something, even if it might not be a perfect solution, is something that comes across, because as some have pointed out, there is at least a chance to limit exposure. The underlying issue is that many feel something must be done to protect children and society in general from the downsides of social media.
France seeks to ban social media for children under 15, and the focus remains on the need for accountability and responsibility. The general sentiment is that social media has had a profound impact on society, and that preventing children from accessing it might be a good thing. With a broad sentiment that there’s no easy solution, people still think it’s worth a try.