By John Q. Hosedrinker 
AP News reports that a preliminary hearing was held in Wisconsin for three individuals linked to Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign, facing felony forgery charges related to a fake elector scheme. Despite challenges to the charges, the case has moved forward while other cases in states like Michigan and Georgia have stalled. The defendants, including attorneys Jim Troupis and Kenneth Chesebro, and aide Mike Roman, are accused of defrauding Republican electors who cast ballots for Trump in 2020. The hearing determined whether enough evidence exists to proceed with the charges, which stem from the submission of fraudulent paperwork to then-Vice President Mike Pence, falsely claiming Trump had won the state.
Read the original article here
Former Trump aides set to appear in Wisconsin over 2020 election fraud charges, and it’s a critical moment. It sounds like there’s a lot riding on this particular case. We’ve seen other states stumble in their attempts to hold people accountable for the fake elector scheme, and the stakes feel incredibly high this time around. The Michigan situation, in particular, seems to have been a real disappointment. From what I gather, the judge’s ruling there basically boiled down to the fake electors claiming they were just clueless, and that ignorance somehow excused their actions. It’s frustrating to think about, especially when the intent of the scheme was clearly to undermine the election results.
This is a real problem, and it directly undermines the entire point of the law. The Michigan case involved a group of people, including, it sounds like, a mayor, who were part of a coordinated effort with a Rudy Giuliani associate, all under the pretense that the Trump team had all this secret evidence of widespread fraud. Of course, that evidence never materialized. The fact that someone might have believed they were acting in good faith doesn’t erase the fundamental illegality of what they were trying to do. It sounds like the Wisconsin case needs to learn from this.
The Wisconsin case has the chance to get it right. It’s easy to get lost in the slow-moving nature of legal processes, but the urgency of these cases is palpable. There’s a real fear that time is on the side of those who would subvert the democratic process. Plus, the specter of pardons looms large. The potential for a future president to simply sweep away any consequences for these actions feels like a significant threat. If past behavior is any indicator, pardoning well-connected criminals seems to be a favored tactic.
Why is this still being harped on after all this time? It has to do with more than just nostalgia. The constant repetition of election lies isn’t just about reliving the past; it’s about setting the stage for the future. The focus on perceived election irregularities is likely to ramp up as we get closer to the 2026 election cycle. It’s a way to prepare the ground for future challenges and potentially influence election outcomes. It’s a calculated strategy, and one that those in Wisconsin need to be prepared to counter.
The goal seems to be to erode the credibility of the election process and create an environment of distrust. It’s a dangerous game, one that can have real-world consequences. The Big Lie isn’t just a collection of false statements; it’s a way to discredit anyone who dares to question the narrative. This is clear when we see the “fraud” narrative used to justify actions that are designed to overturn the will of the people. It’s a strategy designed to reshape the political landscape.
This isn’t just about a few isolated instances of misinformation. The spread of these beliefs has had a tangible impact, particularly among Republican voters. The willingness to accept the false claim that the 2020 election was stolen has actually increased over time, which shows the effectiveness of the strategy. It’s a perfect example of how the narrative takes hold and becomes almost impossible to shake, and is an alarming trend.
The aim is to influence future elections through the use of fear and misinformation. If they can point to any fraud and enact rules in their favor, they will. Trump likely understands the implications of this strategy. He is either fully aware of the goal or doing it for the purpose of garnering political support. It’s a strategy that’s all about control, and it’s designed to keep power within a specific group.
The implications of this strategy stretch far into the future. The fact that these cases are reaching court is an important milestone. Even if there are setbacks or legal technicalities, these cases matter and have the potential to change the political narrative. We have to consider how these cases might play out in the long term, especially if there’s a favorable outcome. This can have ripple effects for years to come.
Then there is the possibility of high-level intervention. With the Supreme Court having the final say in many legal matters, it’s possible that an attempt will be made to reach that Court in order to have it rule in Trump’s favor and pardon his felony convictions. This is a purely political move, and it’s designed to further undermine the legal system. It’s all about the political strategy and what will be most effective in the long run.
Ultimately, the Wisconsin case has to deliver a win in order to counter this momentum. It’s about protecting the integrity of the election process. It’s about ensuring that those who attempt to undermine democracy are held accountable. This isn’t just about the past; it’s about safeguarding the future.