By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In the wake of the deadly Brown University shooting on December 13, 2025, the FBI released new photos and videos of a person of interest. These images depict a man wearing dark clothing near the university hours before the incident, and authorities believe he is the same individual seen in previously released footage. As the gunman remains at large and is considered armed and dangerous, a reward of up to $50,000 is being offered for information leading to his identification, arrest, and conviction. The public is urged to review the images and contact the authorities with any relevant information, as the investigation continues.
Read the original article here
FBI shares new photos of person of interest in deadly Brown University shooting, and it’s understandably a topic that’s stirring up a lot of reaction. It seems like the investigation is continuing, with the Bureau releasing new images of the individual they’re seeking in connection with the tragic events. The general sentiment seems to be a mix of frustration, concern, and, hopefully, a cautious optimism that these new leads might finally bring some closure to this heartbreaking case.
The identity of the individual is still unknown, but the new photos give us a better visual, and comments suggest the person appears to be male, of light complexion, and with a heavier build. People are pointing out a distinctive gait, which could be a key identifying factor. The hope is that this information, combined with the images, will help someone recognize the person and provide valuable information to the authorities.
The reactions also reveal a lack of trust in the authorities. Many are frustrated that the investigation has been going on for a while without a resolution. Some people are expressing strong skepticism about the FBI’s handling of the case, raising questions about the effectiveness of the investigation and the competence of those involved.
There’s a palpable sense of disbelief that a shooting occurred and that the person responsible has remained at large. Some feel that in an age of pervasive surveillance, with cameras everywhere, it’s unbelievable that the perpetrator hasn’t been apprehended.
The comments also reflect a deep worry, with some saying they genuinely believe it is incompetence, while others are questioning the resources allocated to the investigation. Some are making comparisons to other cases, like the “we got him” announcements that later turned out to be false leads, leading to the wrongful accusation of innocent individuals. There’s a strong call for accountability and a desire for those responsible to be brought to justice.
There are also concerns about the quality of the surveillance footage itself. The suggestion that better security coverage is needed is a common one. There’s a general feeling that the quality of the photos is poor, leading to the belief that the images won’t be effective in helping identify the person.
A few comments point out the physical appearance of the person of interest, specifically comparing them to ICE agents, or perhaps someone who works in law enforcement or security. It is important to remember that judging a person on their looks, or making assumptions based on appearance is not wise, and we need to let the evidence speak for itself.
One of the interesting points raised is the possibility of the person wearing a disguise or using prosthetics. This highlights the complexity of the investigation and the need for investigators to consider all possibilities.
There is also the suggestion that the person may not be from the immediate area, judging by how they seem to be looking around. The commenters have an eye for detail, and are trying to piece together any information they can.
Some people feel that the investigation is taking too long or that the authorities are not acting with the urgency the situation warrants. Some are even questioning the accuracy of the information being released, making it a critical reminder of the importance of verifying information and avoiding the spread of misinformation.
A lot of the conversation revolves around the details of the case, such as the type of weapon used, which is missing from the general discussion. This underscores the frustration with the lack of information and the need for more transparency in the investigation.
Finally, it seems the person of interest is yet to be found. The whole federal government is being criticized for its ability to deliver justice. It’s hard not to be concerned about the state of the investigation given some of the comments. Hopefully, these new photos will provide a breakthrough in the case, and help bring the person responsible to justice.