By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Bongino, newly appointed as a deputy director, stated he was previously paid for his opinions but now focuses on fact-based investigations. Despite this, he continues to express opinions, specifically referencing conspiracy theories surrounding the “collusion hoax.” These opinions, echoing earlier statements made on X, including suggestions of an FBI “inside job” related to the January 6th riot, indicate his opinion-based commentary remains active.
Read the original article here
Top FBI Official Admits He Made Stuff Up Before Trump Hired Him – it’s a sentence that just hangs in the air, doesn’t it? It’s the kind of statement that should immediately set off alarm bells, especially when it concerns someone in a position of significant power and influence. It’s like finding out your mechanic used to intentionally sabotage cars before they started working on yours. It makes you question everything, doesn’t it? The core issue here isn’t just that someone admitted to fabricating information; it’s that this admission seems to be met with a shrug, or worse, accepted as par for the course.
The comments paint a pretty clear picture. This person wasn’t just “making stuff up;” they were, allegedly, being *paid* to do so. That changes the whole dynamic. It transforms the act from a casual embellishment into a calculated form of propaganda. It suggests a willingness to manipulate and mislead for personal gain, and that’s a dangerous attribute, especially in a role where truth and integrity are paramount. The idea of someone who was previously a “propagandist” now holding a position of authority within a law enforcement agency raises some serious concerns about potential bias and the reliability of information.
The admission is also compounded by a statement that the individual plans to *return* to this behavior after their current job. It’s a blatant disregard for ethical conduct, as if the position is merely a temporary hiatus from a career of deceit. The comments suggest that this lack of remorse, and indeed, the open acknowledgment of dishonesty, is met with support, or at the very least, a lack of accountability from some quarters. That’s what really hits you in the gut. The lack of accountability. If the lies are working for you, why stop?
The situation also highlights a deeper, more troubling trend: the apparent erosion of the importance of facts and truth in certain corners of the political landscape. The comments suggest that some people are willing to overlook blatant lies, as long as those lies align with their pre-existing beliefs. This creates an environment where objective truth becomes secondary to ideological loyalty, which, frankly, is incredibly unhealthy for a society that relies on shared facts for common ground. This is where it goes from an individual issue to a societal one.
The criticism points out that the individual, during their previous career, was adept at crafting hyperbolic narratives and spreading disinformation. The example provided of twisting a story about aid for transgender people to suggest widespread preferential treatment illustrates how these tactics work. They take a kernel of truth, distort it, and then blow it up into something designed to evoke outrage and reinforce existing biases. This is a very targeted approach, and sadly, it can work all too well.
The comments also touch on the perception of this individual’s appointment. The idea that this person was hired specifically because of their willingness to lie and spread disinformation, not despite it, is a pretty disturbing prospect. It’s hard to imagine that anyone truly believes that this hire happened by accident, or that the individual’s past actions were not considered. It’s like putting a wolf in charge of the hen house and expecting different results.
The frustration expressed in the comments is palpable. People feel like they are operating in a world where facts simply don’t matter, where those in power are not held accountable, and where those who are caught lying are not only not punished but celebrated. It’s a frustrating position to be in, and it’s understandable why people are angry and worried. There’s a distinct feeling of something being broken in the system.
The comments end on a bleak note, and it is a fair question to ask what options people have to affect change when facts don’t work. When those in power openly embrace dishonesty, and their supporters are seemingly unfazed by it, what avenues remain for holding them accountable? That’s what’s really left hanging in the air after digesting these comments. And that’s what makes this entire situation so alarming.