A wave of suspected Russian sabotage has been unfolding across Europe since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, with Poland and Estonia being major targets. This campaign, which includes incidents like train derailments and arson attacks, is believed to be orchestrated by Russian intelligence services, aiming to disrupt support for Ukraine and create division within Europe. While the damage from individual attacks has been relatively minor, the campaign is resource-intensive, straining European security services and fostering greater international cooperation. Moscow often employs foreign individuals with criminal backgrounds, making it difficult to fully prevent these attacks.

Read the original article here

Russia is trying to overwhelm Europe with its sabotage campaign, Western officials say, and it’s a growing concern across the continent. It seems like the situation is developing into a complex, multifaceted challenge, with various types of attacks being reported, from cyberattacks to physical acts of sabotage. The main idea here is that Russia is actively working to destabilize Europe using non-traditional warfare tactics.

It’s evident that Western officials are expressing alarm about the extent and sophistication of these alleged Russian operations. The scale of the attacks is reportedly causing a strain on security resources, with some intelligence agencies dedicating as much time to investigating Russian interference as they do to counter-terrorism efforts. This suggests that the issue is not only serious but also consuming a significant amount of resources, which is really impactful on their ability to carry out all their other functions.

The forms of these attacks are varied, including everything from setting fires and planning explosions to cyberattacks. The data suggests that there’s been a noticeable increase in incidents in the last year or so, indicating an escalation of these activities. There’s a clear pattern of targeted actions designed to disrupt, intimidate, and sow discord. The range of tactics employed shows a deliberate strategy aimed at destabilizing European infrastructure and society.

The responses to these attacks appear to vary. Some people think a more aggressive response is needed. On the other hand, the reality is that aggressive military action is not currently on the table. It is argued that Europe has significant economic and demographic advantages over Russia. The focus seems to be more on long-term strategy and maintaining support for Ukraine, as Russia’s ongoing military campaign there is draining its resources.

There are many discussions on how the EU should respond to the campaign. Some people believe that Europe should “return the favor” and respond in kind to any of Russia’s acts of sabotage by sabotaging something Russian in Russia. There is also the idea of putting pressure on any resistance groups. However, there are many differing opinions on what the EU should do or what they may already be doing.

The fact that so many different types of attacks are taking place indicates a broader strategy beyond just one specific goal. It suggests an intention to test the resilience of European societies and institutions.

The potential for escalation is also a significant concern. The nature of these attacks, and the responses to them, could easily spiral out of control. It seems like the West is still deciding the best way to respond to these Russian tactics.