Epstein Files: Prince Andrew Sought “Inappropriate Friends” from Ghislaine Maxwell

Newly released documents from the Jeffrey Epstein files reveal an email exchange from August 2001 between Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell. In the email, from an address labeled “The Invisible Man” and signed “A,” Mountbatten-Windsor inquired if Maxwell could find him “some new inappropriate friends.” Maxwell responded, stating she had only found “appropriate friends” and would inform him of church meetings. This exchange occurred shortly after Mountbatten-Windsor’s retirement from the Royal Navy and amid growing scrutiny over his association with Epstein and Maxwell.

Read the original article here

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor appears to have asked Ghislaine Maxwell for ‘new inappropriate friends,’ Epstein files show. Honestly, where do you even begin with this? The latest revelations from the Epstein files paint a truly appalling picture, and it’s hard not to feel a mixture of disgust and, frankly, a sense of vindication. We’ve long suspected, and now, it’s just becoming undeniable. The details emerging from these documents, specifically the emails, are incredibly damning.

The email itself, where Andrew supposedly asked Maxwell for “new inappropriate friends,” is just…grim. The sheer casualness with which he seemingly made this request is chilling. “Let me know when you are coming over as I am free from 25th August until 2nd Sept and want to go somewhere hot and sunny with some fun people before having to put my nose firmly to the grindstone for the Fall,” it reads. The phrase “inappropriate friends” is an understatement of epic proportions, and it’s hard to interpret it any other way. The fact that this was communicated via email, a permanent record, highlights a shocking level of arrogance or perhaps a sense of untouchability. The fact that he was allegedly emailing this shows a complete disregard for the potential consequences of his actions.

It’s clear from what’s coming out, the scale of this isn’t just about Epstein. It’s about a network, a web of influence, and a deep, systemic rot. The timing of the King stripping Andrew of his titles and the public revelations of the content of the Epstein files strongly implies there were leaks of the content to the Palace months before its release. This suggests that the Palace was well aware of the content and was forced to take action to mitigate the reputational damage and the potential legal implications. It’s hard not to feel that there’s a real lack of accountability and the true extent of the depravity is only now starting to surface.

The entire situation underscores the vast privilege and insulation enjoyed by those at the top. It feels like we’re constantly being drip-fed information, each new revelation adding another layer of horror. The fact that the Queen, who once protected him, is no longer around to shield him is a significant development. It does beg the question though, why wasn’t he arrested long before this? Why has this whole thing been allowed to fester for so long? The veterans’ letter to the Queen, demanding his military titles be stripped, was a pivotal moment. The armed forces are built on standards of conduct, and Andrew’s actions were anything but. It’s a reminder of the power of public pressure and the importance of holding those in positions of power accountable.

The implications of this are far-reaching. The fact that there’s no way that Epstein could have been the only one involved, that there had to be other islands and other people doing the same, and that it’s just a matter of who’s getting away with it, is hard to ignore. It is a terrifying thought, but it is also a reminder that these cases are not isolated incidents.

I find myself thinking about how quickly the media is trying to rehabilitate the image of Fergie. It feels like a concerted effort to spin the narrative, and it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. It’s also hard not to wonder what else we don’t know, what horrors are buried, and what skeletons remain in the closet. The phrase “inappropriate friends,” as Andrew used it, is a euphemism for something truly sinister. It is a reminder of the need for justice, for truth, and for accountability. We should also not forget that Virginia Giuffre’s testimony and the stories that surfaced from those who claimed that Andrew expected sex workers to be provided when visiting places were used to further destroy his argument that he didn’t know the nature of his relationships with those around Epstein.

The fact is, this is just the tip of the iceberg. The more these files are reviewed, the more we’ll find.