By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Denmark and Greenland have jointly condemned the US appointment of a special envoy to Greenland, emphasizing the inviolability of national borders and sovereignty under international law. The leaders reiterated that Greenland belongs to its people and expressed expectations of respect for territorial integrity. This response follows President Trump’s repeated statements about the US acquiring Greenland and his appointment of Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry to advance American interests there. Denmark’s foreign minister will summon the US ambassador for an explanation, while the EU and Nordic countries expressed solidarity with Denmark and Greenland, upholding international law.
Read the original article here
Denmark to summon US ambassador over Trump Greenland envoy appointment, it seems, has become a real headache, and understandably so. This whole situation is a tangled mess of diplomatic awkwardness, potential security concerns, and frankly, a bit of head-scratching over the motivations behind it all. It’s hard to ignore the feeling that something isn’t quite right when the United States starts appointing people with a clear agenda of annexation to roles concerning a close ally. This is not the kind of behavior you expect from a friend, or at least a friend who respects your sovereignty.
The fact that Denmark is summoning the US ambassador is a significant move, far beyond a simple political statement. It signals a serious level of concern, almost a boundary test between allies. The whole situation has raised questions about the U.S.’s intentions and its respect for international norms. The feeling here is that this is a case of the US behaving like a “rogue friend,” and that the threat to Denmark and Greenland is, in fact, genuine.
The actions of the former US administration, and its current supporters, have really thrown a wrench in the works. Some are even going as far as to suggest that Denmark and Greenland should consider drastic measures, like arresting those individuals upon their next visit. They are even saying that simply refusing to acknowledge this envoy, or any contact he may try to establish, is the way to go. It makes sense, as the US has no jurisdiction over Greenland, so why wouldn’t the Danes and Greenlanders simply kick him out?
The appointment itself feels like part of a larger, worrying trend. The idea of the US attempting to expand its influence, even to the point of possibly trying to acquire territory, is a bit unsettling. It’s natural to feel like this is part of a larger, concerning pattern of bigger countries flexing their muscle, and becoming imperialistic. The potential for the US to cherry-pick what it wants in the world and take it, is a very real fear, and Greenland just seems to be the latest on the list of “what-ifs.”
Looking back, the past actions of the US, especially concerning its allies, has made it hard to ignore the more darker possibilities. The lack of any plan to replace outgoing ambassadors speaks volumes. The focus on Greenland, and even possibly Canada, along with the recent funding for Ukraine, creates a picture that’s frankly not very comforting.
The appointment of this envoy to Greenland raises a lot of questions. Some wonder whether it’s simply a tactic to distract from other issues, or if there’s a more strategic goal at play. Perhaps this is all because the US believes, due to climate change, that the Arctic shipping lanes are something they want to control. Whatever the underlying motivations are, the effect is the same: it’s undermining trust and creating tension between allies.
The reaction from some Danes is completely understandable. They feel betrayed by the US, an ally in numerous conflicts, and now feel they have been made a fool. There is no doubt that the American political system has lost their respect. The sentiment of many is that this is simply a case of a criminal president trying to sabotage and hurt people, and that the only option is to tell him and his representatives to go away.
From the outside looking in, it’s hard not to see this as a high-stakes game. The former administration’s playbook seems to be to follow Russia’s lead, and try to make the most of it. There is also the obvious worry that this is tied to something more sinister, like the Epstein files, and the opening of a child trafficking enterprise. It’s really hard to imagine that this is a friendly gesture, and it’s even harder to see what good it’s doing anyone.
The solution, though, might be easier than it looks. A collective “no thanks” to the envoy, combined with the US being told to sod off, may be the most straightforward approach. It might be time for European countries and others to start implementing more checks for US passport holders, and begin to act in their own best interests. And with the US already shifting Greenland from EUCOM to NORTHCOM, and taking stakes in the mines, it might be time for Denmark and Greenland to have security discussions with Russia and China. This is, of course, a troubling thought, but the times are changing.
The situation is a testament to the fact that the world order is shifting, and that old alliances are being tested. If allies are not treated well, it makes sense that they begin looking for others who will. The whole thing really does leave a bad taste in your mouth.