By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Border Patrol has taken a significant role in deportation operations, leading to public outcry due to incidents like the arrest of a daycare worker. This has spurred calls for accountability and even the potential elimination of agencies like ICE, with some Democrats introducing legislation to limit their functions. While some Democrats are seeking to strip ICE of its core functions, the opposition believes that the rhetoric used against the agents has led to violence. However, this view contrasts with others who are condemning the government’s actions toward immigrants, with some Republicans and other notable figures also speaking out.
Read the original article here
Abolish ICE creeps back into Democratic messaging, and it seems like a lot of people are pretty happy about it. The general sentiment is that ICE, as it currently exists, is beyond repair. It’s viewed as a deeply flawed organization, almost irredeemable, and a breeding ground for abuses of power. The idea of simply replacing it with something more accountable, a revamped immigration enforcement agency, is a common refrain. The key here is accountability. There’s a strong desire to see a new agency with clear rules, transparency, and a commitment to upholding the law.
The problem, as many see it, isn’t necessarily the concept of immigration enforcement itself, but the way ICE has been operating. Accounts of misconduct, lack of oversight, and a culture that enables abuse are frequently mentioned. There’s a feeling that ICE has become a tool that could be, and potentially already has been, exploited by those in power. The use of federal law enforcement for political purposes, particularly in the context of the Trump administration, is a major concern.
The call to abolish ICE often extends beyond just dismantling the agency. It encompasses the need for legal consequences for any wrongdoing that has occurred. This goes hand-in-hand with the idea of a complete overhaul – a new beginning where past mistakes aren’t repeated. The desire for investigations, prosecutions, and even a “Nuremberg style” accountability for crimes against humanity shows a serious indictment of ICE’s operations.
The timing of this renewed push is also interesting. There’s a sense that the current political climate, and perhaps the upcoming elections, provide an opportunity to push this idea forward. The perception is that the “Abolish ICE” message resonates with a significant portion of the electorate, and the suggestion is that embracing this stance could actually be a winning strategy. Some go so far as to suggest that a candidate running on a platform of abolishing ICE would gain widespread support.
However, it’s also recognized that this is a potentially controversial position. The fear is that the “Abolish ICE” label could be easily weaponized by opponents. The historical context of the “defund the police” movement serves as a cautionary tale. Some express concern that such strong messaging could negatively impact election outcomes, even though it appears very popular with the base.
Another key component is the need to address the broader context of immigration. The comments highlight how the GOP has successfully painted a misleading picture of the Democrats’ position on immigration, framing them as advocates of open borders. The solution, in this case, would be to clearly articulate a position on immigration that is both practical and just.
There is a sense that the Democrats can and should be on the offensive, using ICE’s actions to expose corruption and advocate for their end. This, in turn, would allow for the creation of an improved immigration system that works. The overall sentiment is that the time for incremental change is over. The need for a complete transformation is emphasized. The core of the issue is to hold individuals accountable.
Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the “Abolish ICE” message, while potentially polarizing, has significant support and can be a rallying cry for reform. The message is to take bold steps, dismantle the organization, and prosecute all the wrongdoing.