By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During Mobile World Congress 2024, Michael and Susan Dell announced a $6.25 billion commitment to fund investment accounts for approximately 25 million American children, marking the largest donation of its kind. This initiative aims to support families and encourage savings, aligning with a new federal program providing tax-advantaged investment accounts for children under 18, with initial grants of $1,000 for eligible newborns. The Dells’ contribution will include $250 to children aged 10 and under who were born before January 1, 2025, in specified income-based ZIP codes, while Dell Technologies will also match government grants for employee’s children. These “Trump accounts” are designed to boost children’s financial futures and are limited to investment in diversified funds, encouraging additional parental contributions.
Read the original article here
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. The initial thought here is a simple one: wow, that’s a lot of money. But then, it quickly spirals into a mix of skepticism and frustration. It’s a bit like getting a tiny portion of a giant pizza when what you really wanted was the whole thing. The numbers, when you break them down, are a little underwhelming: around $250 per child. It’s hard to imagine that sum making a significant impact on a child’s future, especially when you consider the cost of, well, just about anything these days.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. Now, the name associated with this project adds a layer of complexity. History tells us that anything carrying *that* particular name might be viewed with a degree of caution. It stirs up feelings of a potential con, or maybe just a way to further the interests of the already wealthy. This feeling is further solidified by the fact that the wealthy are doing everything other than what’s needed, which is paying taxes. This leads to the thought that perhaps there is something else going on, such as corruption, cronyism, and bribery.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. One of the more interesting details is the structure of these “Trump accounts”. The idea that these funds might not be easily accessible, and could potentially roll into retirement accounts later, raises an eyebrow. It makes you wonder if it’s really designed to benefit the children, or if it’s more about providing a long-term advantage for the wealthy. And, what about the fees? Opening fees, trading fees, withdrawal fees… it all adds up, doesn’t it? It’s easy to start suspecting something shady, that this scheme might somehow benefit some bank.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. Consider the idea that a significant portion of this is intended to help American children. It would be a lot more powerful, and a lot less controversial, to simply provide those same children with free healthcare, free school lunches, and access to affordable childcare. It’s hard not to notice the irony of this, the very people who criticize socialism are now, through a different name, trying to create a watered-down version of it.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. Then there is the issue of taxation. It does make you wonder if simply paying a fair share of taxes would be a more effective way to help. Instead of this complex, potentially flawed system, the government could use those tax revenues to fund programs that benefit all children, such as improving education and providing essential services. The reality is that $250 might not even cover basic necessities in a few years, let alone provide a lasting financial boost.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. The argument that these accounts will give children a leg up in life, the opportunity to buy a home, start a business, and all that… it’s a bit of a stretch. Those things are more likely to happen if a child grows up in a stable home with access to resources like good healthcare and education. It’s not about the initial deposit, it’s about the foundation. It seems a bit like a publicity stunt, the rich throwing a small amount of money at a problem to avoid paying more in taxes.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. There is a sense that this donation could be more about the donors and the current administration than the children. This is amplified by the fact that these accounts seemingly have very little financial benefits when compared to other tax-advantaged account options. It seems like a way to funnel money back to those who already have plenty. It’s almost insulting in its lack of impact, especially when you consider the scale of the problems facing so many American children.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. The cynic in me can’t help but wonder if this is an opportunity to benefit from government contracts, or some other form of underhanded dealings. It’s hard to ignore the potential conflicts of interest, the possibility of corruption. It makes me wonder if anyone will be held accountable in the future.
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. In the grand scheme of things, this is likely a drop in the bucket. It’s not addressing the root causes of economic inequality, or the challenges that many families face. It’s a gesture, maybe even a good intention, but it doesn’t seem like it will really change anything in a meaningful way. Why not just provide access to education, child care, and healthcare?
Michael and Susan Dell to donate $6.25 billion to fund “Trump accounts” for 25 million U.S. kids. While it is good to provide children with assets in their names, wouldn’t it be better to provide more significant financial relief, support child care, and help parents with the burden of raising kids? Instead of trying to fix the system with such an obvious and small effort, why not pay taxes and do something real?