By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A representative for Bill Clinton has accused the White House of using him as a scapegoat after recently released government files included photos of the former president with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The statement claims this move is a deflection tactic by those who are trying to shield themselves from scrutiny, referencing comments made by White House officials. While the released photographs show Clinton with various individuals, including in an underground pool with Maxwell, the former president has maintained that he cut ties with Epstein around 2005. The Justice Department’s photo release coincides with upcoming depositions by both Bill and Hillary Clinton to the House oversight committee regarding their connections to Epstein.
Read the original article here
Bill Clinton says White House is using him as a scapegoat after Epstein files release.
It’s pretty clear, judging by the reaction, that the release of the Epstein files has stirred up a hornet’s nest. A key sentiment emerging from the whole situation is that Bill Clinton feels he’s being used as a scapegoat. The general consensus appears to be that the White House is strategically focusing on Clinton, strategically using his image and associations to deflect attention from others, potentially including figures close to the current administration. Many are not downplaying the fact that Clinton had a relationship with Epstein and should be investigated.
The overwhelming feeling is that the timing and curation of the released files point to a deliberate strategy. The argument is, if Clinton was the primary target of concern, the files would have been released the moment the opportunity presented itself and not delayed to release at a time when the information could be more easily controlled and strategically disseminated. The fact that Clinton’s image and associations with Epstein and Maxwell are prominently featured, while information on other individuals, particularly those connected to the current administration, is heavily redacted, fuels the suspicion of a deliberate cover-up or deflection. There’s a strong sense of “two things can be true at once,” with the idea that Clinton’s potentially questionable actions, if proven, shouldn’t excuse anyone else involved from scrutiny.
The issue of transparency is central. The White House, by releasing images and documents that appear to single out Clinton, is arguably creating a narrative. The counter-argument is that this is a smoke and mirrors act, designed to distract from the alleged misdeeds of other individuals, like former President Trump and other public figures. Some people question why other key players in the files seem to be protected or have their involvement obscured. The demand for full transparency, the complete release of all documents without redaction, is loud and clear. There is frustration that all the files are not released and that photos of people with other people is anything more than circumstantial evidence.
A prevailing sentiment echoes throughout the response: “arrest them all.” The public wants to see justice served, regardless of political affiliation or status. The core of this issue comes down to a fundamental belief that if anyone committed crimes, especially those involving the exploitation of minors, they must be held accountable. This includes Clinton, Trump, Gates, and anyone else implicated in the files. The sentiment of, “down with them all” is clear.
The potential for Clinton to “spill the beans” is mentioned by some. The suggestion is that Clinton, having been thrown under the bus, might have the opportunity to take down others with him, regardless of political affiliation. Some might see that as an ironic turn of events, a means for Clinton to potentially mitigate his own exposure by exposing others. It’s a testament to the complex web of relationships and power dynamics at play.
The public’s response emphasizes the need to look beyond the immediate focus on Clinton. The collective view is that, while Clinton’s associations and actions deserve scrutiny, the focus should not solely be on him. The Epstein case involved a network of people, and the demand is for the investigation and prosecution of all those involved.