By Matt Underwood China holds low-key Nanjing Massacre memorial despite Japan tensions, which is a significant event that deserves continued remembrance, regardless of the complexities of current diplomatic relations. It’s a reminder of a horrific event, akin to the Holocaust or the atomic bombings, and its importance extends to all of humanity. The low-key nature of this year’s commemoration doesn’t diminish its impact. The atrocities committed during the Nanjing Massacre, alongside the horrific experiments conducted by Japan’s Unit 731 using live Chinese people for bio/chemical weapons testing, represent some of the most egregious war crimes of World War II. These acts demand to be discussed and remembered, just as we remember the Holocaust.
China, in this instance, is absolutely justified in holding the memorial. The events of the Nanjing Massacre were a tragedy, and it’s perfectly reasonable for the victims and their descendants to keep the memory alive. It’s a moment to reflect on the darkness that humanity is capable of and to strive for peace, knowing that we are capable of such horrors if the conditions are right. There’s a vital need for us to remember these events.
The historical context is critical for learning from the past and preventing future atrocities. The Nanjing Massacre serves as a stark warning. The fact that Japan, at least officially, often downplays or denies the massacre, is deeply troubling. While some may criticize China’s motives, the act of remembering this tragedy is legitimate, especially given the historical denial. This is a point where China is doing the right thing.
The fact that the memorial was low-key suggests a calculated approach, given the present tensions between the two nations. It shows restraint, a strategic decision to honor the victims without inflaming diplomatic relations. This approach is worthy of acknowledgment. One can critique China on numerous issues, but here, the focus is on a solemn remembrance of a tragic historical event.
There are many that feel a sense of outrage due to the historical atrocities Japan committed. The scale of the cruelty and casualties inflicted on the Chinese people was immense. There were instances of POW fatalities under Japan that were higher than under Germany, illustrating the widespread brutality, which, unfortunately, wasn’t solely targeted towards Asian people. The “Rape of Nanjing,” a phrase which captures the essence of the atrocities, should be remembered.
The debate around China’s motives is a separate matter. Some argue China uses the memorial to fuel a victim complex. However, that should not invalidate the importance of remembering the Nanjing Massacre. It’s also fair to note that many nations struggle with historical accountability and there is a lot of revisionism.
In conclusion, the decision to hold the memorial, albeit in a low-key manner, is a recognition of the tragic past and a step towards remembering the victims of a horrific event. It’s a reminder of the need to confront the darkest aspects of history and to learn from the past.