By John Q. Hosedrinker 
China is implementing a 13% value-added tax (VAT) on condoms and contraceptives starting January 1st, reversing a three-decade exemption, as part of its efforts to boost the birthrate and modernize its tax laws. This move, included in a 2024 VAT law, follows the relaxation of the one-child policy and the introduction of various incentives like childcare subsidies, despite having a marginal impact on the country’s birth rate. While some experts believe this tax will have a negligible effect on fertility, others express concern about the message it sends, particularly for women, and highlight that the revenue generation is not the primary motivation. The tax change may be a shift towards less direct encouragement and an attempt to codify the tax system further.
Read the original article here
China to hike tax on condoms in attempt to boost falling birth rate, and well, this is certainly a head-scratcher. It feels like we’re watching a real-life parody. The idea? Taxing condoms, effective January 1st, with a 13% VAT. The supposed logic? To somehow, magically, incentivize people to have more children. The world’s reaction? A collective eye roll, to put it mildly. I mean, we’re talking about a tax on safe sex, folks. Isn’t that a bit counterintuitive, especially if the goal is to *improve* things, not make them… well, worse?
China’s logic, at least on the surface, is they are attempting to address their falling birth rate. Their problem is they have an aging population and a shrinking workforce, issues many countries are grappling with. After decades of a one-child policy, they are now trying to encourage people to have more children. But, this particular approach is…unconventional, to say the least. It’s like they’re hoping to solve a complex problem with a remarkably simplistic, and potentially damaging, solution.
The financial impact of the tax itself is likely to be relatively small. A pack of condoms costs, on average, a few dollars. But the symbolism of the move is what really stings. This tax is, at best, a symbolic gesture, and at worst, a policy that could lead to unintended consequences. It raises questions about access to safe sex and reproductive health, particularly for those with limited resources.
And let’s be real, is taxing condoms really going to outweigh the costs of raising a child? That’s a rhetorical question, of course. We all know the answer. Raising a child is incredibly expensive, and that cost is a major factor in people’s decisions about whether or not to have kids. It’s the cost of childcare, education, healthcare, and everything in between. The cost will never be cheaper than the price of a pack of condoms.
This move feels like a continuation of the same kind of thinking that got them into this demographic mess in the first place. You know, that whole one-child policy thing. That policy led to some pretty awful results, and the world is still reeling from the effects. Now it looks like the government is still trying to control family planning.
There’s a sense of “déjà vu all over again” with this. We’ve seen this movie before, and it rarely ends well. It makes you wonder if they’ve learned anything from their past mistakes. They’re trying to solve a problem caused by government policies with… more government policies. It’s a bit like the old adage about doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
The core issue here is not about the availability of condoms. The underlying problems relate to a lot of factors. People don’t want children for a complex set of reasons. The economic issues, the pressures of modern life, the gender imbalances caused by previous policies – these are what the government should be addressing. Things like the cost of living, access to affordable housing, work-life balance, and support systems for families. These are the things that actually make a difference.
This attempt to boost birth rates by taxing condoms echoes the historical failures of other population control measures. It seems like the government is choosing the path of least resistance. It’s much easier to implement a tax than to address complex societal issues. This whole thing makes you wonder what kind of advice they are getting.
Ultimately, this is a policy that is likely to be ineffective and potentially harmful. It’s a band-aid solution that ignores the root causes of the problem. It’s a sad state of affairs when governments around the world seem unable or unwilling to address the real reasons why people aren’t having children. Taxing condoms won’t solve anything, but it might just make things worse.