By John Q. Hosedrinker 
This is a reminder that registration is complete. To access the site’s features, a page refresh or navigation to another page on the website is required. This action will automatically log the user in. Alternatively, refreshing the browser itself will also log the user in.
Read the original article here
‘Revolt’ at CBS News after Bari Weiss pulls story critical of Trump
The decision by CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss to pull a 60 Minutes report investigating the Trump administration’s actions has sparked a significant uproar, and the feeling is definitely not positive. The whole situation feels like a betrayal of the core mission of journalism, with many viewing it as a political move rather than a journalistic one. Some are seeing this as an early sign of what is to come if the current trend continues. The fact that the story was shelved, especially given that it concerned alleged abuses, is a big problem for many.
The heart of the issue, according to those involved, is the feeling that this decision sets a dangerous precedent. It’s perceived as a way for the administration to control the narrative by simply refusing to participate in the reporting process, effectively killing a story. This is a point that resonates deeply with people who value the role of an independent press. It’s about protecting the ability of journalists to investigate and report without fear of censorship or political interference.
Defending the action, the rationale offered by Weiss, that the story “wasn’t ready” and required more information to meet journalistic standards, is being heavily scrutinized. While some may view it as a professional standard, many feel like it’s a convenient cover for something else. Considering the timing and the potential motivations of those at the top, a lot of people feel like the move was calculated.
The context around this decision has fueled the anger, with some pointing fingers at Paramount chair David Ellison. The implication is that this action might be a play to curry favor with Trump. This raises questions about the motivations of those in power and how they may be willing to shape the news for personal or political gains.
The outrage is palpable. The feeling is that the press is in a state of self-sabotage, and the rights to report facts and unbiased information are being discarded in an effort to appease. There is a sense of disbelief, with many struggling to reconcile the actions of Weiss with her public persona. The implication is that she is now functioning as a propagandist.
This has led some to take drastic steps. People are canceling subscriptions and boycotting the network. The sentiment is that CBS is no longer a source of reliable news and is instead becoming a mouthpiece for a specific agenda. The language used is quite strong, with many referring to the situation as “fascist,” and the actions of those involved as “selling out” the journalistic values.
The lack of unity is being seen as a major factor, allowing a specific group to divide and control the narrative. The lack of unity leads to the exploitation of the masses. The perception is that wealthy individuals are taking control of the news business and distorting information to fit their own views and agendas. It’s seen as a fight for truth against forces that are determined to undermine it.
In some of the harshest criticisms, there’s a questioning of Weiss’s qualifications for the role. The lack of a background in investigative journalism is cited as a problem, fueling the sense that she is unqualified to be making decisions about investigative pieces.
The overall sentiment is one of extreme disappointment and a feeling that CBS has betrayed the public trust. The term “Fox News Lite” has been used to describe the network, suggesting that it’s heading down a similar path of political bias and manipulation. There’s a call for action, with individuals and groups seeking to take a stand against the perceived censorship and political influence.