By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Rep. Lauren Boebert alleges that former President Donald Trump’s veto of the “Finish the Arkansas Valley Conduit Act,” a bipartisan bill supporting a Colorado water pipeline, was an act of political retaliation. This bill, which aimed to provide water to nearly 50,000 residents, was vetoed due to concerns over high costs, despite nearly unanimous support in the House. Boebert, who pushed for the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, believes Trump’s decision was a response to her actions, citing a betrayal of his “America First” agenda. This conflict mirrors the strained relationship between Trump and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who also supported the release of the Epstein files and has since fallen out of favor with Trump.
Read the original article here
Boebert suggests Trump vetoed Colorado water pipeline bill as ‘retaliation’ for Epstein discharge petition, and this revelation, frankly, doesn’t shock anyone. The consensus seems to be that Trump’s capacity for pettiness is legendary, and this action appears to be yet another example of his willingness to use his power in vindictive ways. It seems clear that the focus is on a discharge petition regarding the controversial Tina Peters case. In this specific situation, the action of the veto is perceived as a direct act of revenge, which is not surprising, given past behaviors.
The sentiment that Trump is transactional and driven by self-interest is repeatedly echoed. Many seem to have been pointing this out for quite some time, and it’s finally dawning on some who were, perhaps, previously blinded by allegiance. His willingness to leverage important matters, such as a state’s access to water, for personal or political gain underscores this point. The idea that his actions are about more than just the immediate issue at hand, and could very well involve the pursuit of revenge, especially regarding the Tina Peters case, is strongly indicated.
This brings up another point – the water pipeline itself. It’s a key issue for many, particularly residents in areas with poor water quality. The impact of the veto is far-reaching, directly affecting people’s lives. The frustration surrounding the water pipeline is very tangible, and it goes beyond mere political disagreement. It’s about access to a basic necessity and the quality of life for the people. This is clearly a case where political maneuvering has very real consequences.
The discussions then touch on the idea that Trump’s actions often cause division, even among those who are supposed to be on his side. Boebert’s potential shift in attitude mirrors a growing trend of disillusionment, as the costs of aligning with him become more apparent. The suggestion of Trump vetoing the bill might be an instance where his actions are seen as an affront to principles.
It is strongly suggested that Trump’s pettiness is a driving force behind his decisions. His actions, including the veto of the pipeline bill, are seen as manifestations of a deeply ingrained character trait, a trait of revenge. The belief that his actions are often self-serving and vindictive is a theme throughout. His focus on settling scores over policy, it’s being implied, is a significant part of the problem.
The situation is being presented not as an isolated incident, but as a pattern of behavior. Trump’s actions are described as those of an abusive narcissist. This paints a picture of someone who uses power to punish perceived slights and reward loyalty.
Furthermore, there is a recurring skepticism about whether the people affected will hold Trump accountable. There’s a cynicism that suggests that loyalty to Trump trumps the practical concerns of the people, even those on the side that would suffer. This point suggests a deeper issue of political polarization, where loyalty to a party or figure overrides common sense.
There is a sense of inevitability about Trump’s behavior. It is presented as an expected outcome from someone with a proven history of operating in this manner. Many feel the idea is to override Putin puppy’s veto. The overall tone is one of exasperation, of having recognized a pattern and being disappointed, but not surprised, by its continuation.
The issue of the Tina Peters case and the desire to release files to potentially hurt the democrats. The discharge petition and the veto are linked. The question is asked: “why retaliate?” The answer being a simple, yet stark confirmation of what many have been thinking: that Trump is a petty man.