By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Australia has implemented a first-of-its-kind ban on social media for those under 16, prompting major platforms like Facebook and Instagram to remove underage accounts and prevent new registrations. While most platforms have confirmed compliance, enforcement faces initial challenges as some teens bypass age verification. The government acknowledges the ban’s imperfections and will gather data to evaluate its impact, including unintended consequences like children moving to less regulated areas online or using VPNs. Regulators will assess platform compliance and could seek fines, while an independent evaluation will examine the ban’s short and long-term effects.
Read the original article here
Millions of children and teens lose access to accounts as Australia’s world-first social media ban begins. Well, this is a big one. It’s a bit of a whirlwind of change, isn’t it? Suddenly, a whole generation of young Australians are finding themselves locked out of their favorite social media haunts. It’s almost palpable, that feeling of a digital rug being pulled out from under them.
Now, you can’t help but wonder about the domino effect. With this ban, how many gaming services that rely on social media logins might find themselves a little quieter? You’ve got games like Roblox, Minecraft, and even platforms like Steam that often use social media for user authentication or integration. It’s bound to cause some ripples.
There’s a definite sense of irony, isn’t there? People have been sounding the alarm about the negative impacts of social media for ages, and now, when someone tries to do something about it, the response is…mixed, to say the least. It’s a good start, some say, even if it’s flawed. Others are already predicting a surge in VPN usage, a migration to smaller platforms, or even kids simply using their parents’ information to get back in.
The thing is, the devil is always in the details. This law was supposedly rushed through without proper consultation and seems to rely on social media companies to enforce it, which, let’s be honest, hasn’t always been their strong suit. Then there’s the inevitable cat-and-mouse game with detection software, which is likely to be easily bypassed.
It’s understandable why this is happening though. The idea is to protect the children, right? It’s a sentiment that usually gets the masses on board, because, who can argue with protecting the kids? But is this the best approach? There’s a concern that it might actually push kids towards less safe areas of the internet, especially if the implementation is poorly executed. Some suggest there could be more issues with incels and negative views towards young boys.
The impact will go beyond just access. There’s the potential for serious political consequences down the line. We can guess these teens who can’t access their social media, will remember who was behind this. The interesting part, perhaps, will be how these digitally-native individuals, who’ve had the rug pulled out from under them, will respond when they come of voting age.
It’s a step in a direction some support. Some people are just tired of social media, and are ready to see it go. This change might be a needed one, in a society where some find social media’s use of engagement manipulation, specifically tailored for each individual, to be harmful to weaker minds.
A key point is that kids will find a way. Remember the 90s, when people would enter in fake birthdates to get access to things? The same holds true today. Many believe that this just won’t work, and are pointing to the inevitable rise of VPNs and the shift towards less-regulated platforms as indicators of the law’s shortcomings.
It’s also worth noting the unintended consequences. It’s a fascinating situation, especially considering how many people seem to have zero IT knowledge but are still happy to take part in this change. Some have also pointed out some of the biggest websites, like Roblox, are not even part of the ban, further showcasing the law’s shortcomings.
The core of the issue, really, is finding a balance. People will realize we need a system for age verification online, just as we do in the real world. Perhaps this change is a needed one, and this will allow for a potentially more free experience for adults by relaxing the broad restrictions put in place for protecting children.
Ultimately, it feels like we’re standing at a crossroads. The implementation is going to be challenging, but the intention is probably a good one, or at least a start. Only time will tell if this truly works, and hopefully, other countries will learn from this.