By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Trump Administration initially justified the September Caribbean strike, which resulted in the deaths of all eleven people on board, by claiming the boat was carrying drugs bound for the United States. However, during a briefing, the operation’s commander reportedly revealed the boat was headed to Suriname, contradicting the initial justification. This revelation raises questions about the strike’s legality, as the U.S. government’s own intelligence suggests drug routes from Suriname primarily lead to Europe. Furthermore, reports indicate that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered no survivors, potentially constituting a war crime, and is now under investigation. The bipartisan pushback against the Administration has led to investigations from both houses of Congress.
Read the original article here
Boat Destroyed in ‘Double-Tap’ Strike Was Not Heading to U.S., Admiral Reportedly Tells Lawmakers
So, the whole story starts to unravel when an admiral, presumably with inside information, reportedly told lawmakers a crucial piece of information: the boat that was destroyed in what is being called a “double-tap” strike wasn’t even headed towards the United States. This revelation immediately throws a wrench into the narrative that the military action was directly tied to stopping drug trafficking aimed at American shores. It shifts the focus, and it does so dramatically.
The immediate reaction to this news is a healthy dose of skepticism. It’s hard to imagine, given the distances involved, that this vessel was somehow on a direct course to the U.S. From Venezuela to South Florida is roughly 1400 miles, and it’s not exactly a quick trip in a small boat. Plus, the logic doesn’t quite add up. If you’re smuggling drugs, you wouldn’t typically load a boat with lots of extra people. It’s about maximizing space for the contraband and keeping the crew as small as possible. The assumption that the boat was packed with both drugs and a large crew just doesn’t align with practical smuggling operations.
Then there’s the question of the multiple strikes. Reports indicate that the boat was hit not once, but several times, including additional strikes after the initial blow. The video footage reportedly shown to lawmakers included three more strikes on the wrecked vessel. It’s not just a “double-tap”; it was a relentless barrage. This escalation raises serious questions about the intent behind the operation, especially considering the Geneva Convention and what’s considered acceptable in international waters.
The justification that these were all “drug smugglers” seems like an attempt to sidestep ethical and legal standards. Even if the boat was engaged in illegal activities, it is not a death sentence in the United States. There is supposed to be due process, even for non-citizens. The implications of this situation are vast. It’s the equivalent of preemptively eliminating someone based on mere suspicion, an act that is at odds with any reasonable standard of justice.
The focus on destabilizing the regime of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and securing the country’s oil reserves starts to become a more plausible explanation. It becomes clear that the drug war narrative is just a flimsy facade, designed to mask the actual, far more insidious, motives at play. Experienced and neutral observers are well aware of this, but the American media seems to be fixated on the violation of the Geneva Convention, while failing to call out the corrupt motives of those involved.
The incident raises some unsettling points regarding how those in power are working to twist logic and the narrative to fit their own agendas. It’s a sad state of affairs when we have to question the motives of those in authority. The fact that Trump was able to pardon the former Honduran president, even though he was a convicted drug trafficker, is not how things are supposed to work. This points to a deeper level of corruption.
There is a disturbing lack of clarity surrounding the events. The repeated strikes, the uncertainty of who authorized them, and the lack of a clear explanation raise some serious doubts. There seems to be an underlying agenda to exploit the situation for political gain, potentially by provoking the Venezuelan government and furthering the goals of those interested in its oil reserves.
Let’s also consider the possibility of human trafficking. Even if we assume the worst and the boat was criminally run, innocent people may have been involved in the operation. If that’s the case, then this whole incident becomes an even darker situation, and it really doesn’t matter what the purpose of the boat was. The strikes themselves are highly illegal to begin with.
The incident is causing a ripple of concern. From questioning the legality of the strikes to wondering about the actual goals, this is a mess. The narrative offered is questionable, and the truth seems to be well hidden. The lack of transparency and the apparent disregard for international laws are both concerning. The whole thing seems more and more like a carefully crafted deception.