By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Zelenskyy warned that Russia may initiate attacks on other European countries before the war in Ukraine concludes, citing a “stalemate” for Putin. He believes Putin is capable of opening a second front simultaneously while the war in Ukraine continues. Zelenskyy linked the rise in European criminal activity to Russia’s lack of progress on the front lines. He stated Putin seeks a major external enemy to unite Russia and views the United States and the West as adversaries.
Read the original article here
Let’s delve into the weighty issue of whether Putin might consider attacking an EU country before the war in Ukraine concludes, particularly given the assessment that he finds himself in a stalemate. It’s a complex scenario, and the nuances are worth exploring. The fundamental question revolves around strategy, desperation, and the ever-present shadow of potential escalation.
The idea that Russia would directly target an EU member state is a serious one, though there’s an immediate caveat: Russia has a long history of employing hybrid warfare tactics. These include leveraging social media through platforms like Facebook and TikTok to influence populations and potentially sway elections, as we’ve seen in several European countries. This approach can be far more effective than overt military action. The aim here is to foster pro-Russian sentiment and install leaders favorable to their interests.
However, the core contention is whether Putin might escalate to overt military action. There’s a lot of conjecture around this, and Zelenskyy’s warning is significant. The prevailing thought is that Putin is in a difficult situation. He’s struggling in Ukraine, and his strategic options are dwindling. The theory is that a direct attack on an EU country, especially a NATO member, might be a desperate gambit.
The argument is that a limited military action could serve multiple purposes for Putin. It might provide a pretext for full mobilization within Russia, allowing him to bolster his forces. It could also test NATO’s resolve and potentially sow discord within the alliance, exploiting any perceived weakness or reluctance to respond decisively. Some suggest he could target the Baltics, for example, to test the waters. They aren’t as strong as Ukraine. The response of NATO, or lack thereof, could have massive ramifications.
The counter-argument to this centers on the idea of a stalemate. Putin seems to be in a difficult situation. The war has dragged on, and Russia hasn’t achieved its objectives. An attack on a NATO country could trigger a full-scale war with devastating consequences. The consensus here is that it would be a colossal gamble. The risk of all-out war with NATO, including the potential for nuclear escalation, is something most analysts don’t believe Putin would risk.
The motivations that are suggested for such a move vary. Some think it could be a strategic play to force a larger-scale conflict that Russia could then leverage. Others believe it’s a way to distract from the difficulties in Ukraine and rally his population. Still others consider the possibility that a desperate Putin, facing internal pressure, might do something rash. It’s important to remember that Putin’s calculus could be influenced by a sense of needing to “win” or ensure that everyone “loses” if he can’t win himself.
It’s worth noting that if such an attack were to happen, it could be timed to exploit other geopolitical events, such as a US government shutdown, or elections. It could also coincide with other crises, like any potential conflict involving Taiwan.
Zelenskyy’s warning needs to be interpreted, considering the context of his situation. He may be attempting to galvanize support for Ukraine and keep Europe focused on the threat Russia poses. Whether it’s a strategic assessment or an effort to maintain Western attention, there’s a strong belief that the EU and NATO need to take the threat seriously.
The idea of a stalemate in Ukraine feeds into this narrative. If Russia is truly stuck, as many believe, then an expansion of the conflict might be seen as a desperate attempt to break the impasse. It is important to emphasize that even a limited attack could trigger a larger response. The potential for escalation is real, making any such action extremely risky.
Ultimately, whether Putin would choose to attack an EU country before the Ukrainian conflict ends is an open question. While some speculate it’s a possibility, it’s not a certainty. However, the scenario does highlight the high stakes of the current situation and the potential for the conflict to expand. This makes it crucial for European nations to remain vigilant, maintain solidarity, and support Ukraine.