By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A video featuring ten veterans from various branches of the military has been released in support of Senator Mark Kelly and other congressional colleagues. The video comes in response to the Pentagon’s review of Kelly following his urging of active-duty members to refuse illegal orders. The veterans, representing multiple national organizations, express concern over what they view as politically motivated actions against Kelly. Furthermore, the video highlights a perceived threat to the duty of military members who could be ordered to do things which undermine the very citizens they are supposed to protect.
Read the original article here
Military Veterans Call Out Trump, Hegseth and Pentagon in New Video
The recent video featuring military veterans speaking out against Donald Trump, Sean Hannity, and potential overreach by the Pentagon has ignited a firestorm of discussion. The core of the criticism seems to stem from a deep-seated concern about the erosion of democratic principles and the potential politicization of the military. Veterans, many of whom have dedicated their lives to defending the Constitution, are voicing their alarm over actions and rhetoric they perceive as a threat to those very principles.
One of the central figures of concern is Senator Mark Kelly, a decorated veteran himself, whose past service and present position have made him a target of sorts. The discussions suggest a worry that Kelly, and possibly others, might face repercussions for their political stances or actions. The threat of court-martial and the potential stripping of pensions are viewed with considerable alarm. The call for prominent military figures like Kelly, along with others such as Esper and Milley, to speak out directly underscores the gravity of the situation in the eyes of these veterans.
The video itself, available online, appears to be the catalyst for much of this discourse. It is being described as a moment of “quiet disobedience,” a call for military personnel, past and present, to examine their consciences and consider the direction in which the country is heading. The symbolism of the upside-down American flag, subtly employed by some, represents a clear signal of distress and a rejection of the perceived leadership and values of those targeted. The fact that Trump’s past statements, seemingly dismissive of the sacrifices of veterans, are still being met with support and even applause is a point of bewilderment and disillusionment for some.
The veterans’ criticism extends to the media’s perceived role in shaping the narrative. Concerns are raised about how certain media outlets are pushing a specific, often Republican-aligned, viewpoint. The perceived omission of critical details, such as the fact that Senator Kelly’s wife was a victim of political violence, suggests that the media is failing to fully present the context of the situation and the concerns being raised.
Furthermore, there is a clear sentiment of frustration with figures like Lindsey Graham, whose previous close relationship with the late Senator John McCain has left them open to scrutiny. The veterans are questioning the motivations and allegiances of Graham, who seemed to shift his stance. This shifting of political alliances is not taken lightly by these veterans.
The veterans, and others, are wary of what may occur next. The video seems to be a warning call, a testament to the idea that actions have consequences. There is a general feeling that the military court system is rigged in favor of certain politicians.
Beyond the specific individuals named, the core issue is the perceived erosion of respect for military veterans and the principles they swore to uphold. This includes their pension systems. There are multiple views of these systems.
These discussions also include an observation on the media and the political spectrum. It’s suggested that news networks lean right.
Ultimately, the veterans are calling out the hypocrisy and perceived betrayal of the values they fought to protect. This situation illustrates the deep divisions within the country and the profound emotional impact these divisions are having on those who have served and sacrificed for it.