By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Vice President J.D. Vance reportedly texted Jeff Bezos, urging him to hire Breitbart’s Matthew Boyle to lead The Washington Post’s political team. Vance publicly advocated for Boyle, praising him as a well-sourced journalist, in an interview with Boyle, indicating a desire to reshape the Post’s political coverage. While Bezos did not act on Vance’s suggestion, the Post has faced criticism for a perceived shift to the right in its editorial outlook. This move, along with Vance’s appearance at a Breitbart event instead of Dick Cheney’s funeral, suggests a deliberate effort to align with right-leaning perspectives.
Read the original article here
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The core idea here, as I understand it, is that someone, specifically identified as “Vance,” encouraged Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, to shift the newspaper’s editorial stance further towards the political ideology often associated with Donald Trump, commonly referred to as MAGA (Make America Great Again). This seems to have sparked a lot of discussion, and frankly, some strong opinions, among those who read and previously subscribed to the newspaper.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The reaction appears to be a mix of surprise, disappointment, and even anger from former subscribers who felt alienated by the perceived changes. Some people mentioned canceling their subscriptions, citing specific events like a controversial non-endorsement of a presidential candidate as a turning point. It’s clear that many readers, used to a certain level of journalistic integrity, felt betrayed by what they saw as a political shift. This change likely caused significant damage to the newspaper’s reputation in particular markets.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. There’s a common thread of frustration with media outlets that seem to cater to a specific political base. The suggestion that all media outlets might start reporting the same things from the same viewpoints is seen as a negative trend, eliminating diversity and independent thought. The fear is that the newspaper would become a vehicle for a particular political agenda, thus undermining its credibility and its ability to act as a proper journalistic voice.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The financial aspect of this situation is also quite relevant. The loss of subscribers, particularly print subscriptions, suggests that this shift might not be a successful business move. Many point out that billionaires, like Bezos, are not generally fans of losing money, and they would need a strong commitment to their cause for it to continue if it is causing financial strain.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. Another aspect touched upon is the perceived hypocrisy of those embracing this ideological shift. Some former readers seem to resent the idea of what they consider a shift to appeal to a demographic that historically condemned the “legacy media.” The irony is not lost on those who once valued the Post for its reporting and now feel it has become what it once decried.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The declining subscriptions, specifically, from 2022 to October 2024, seem to support the idea that this is already happening. The numbers are revealing, showcasing a steady decline, particularly after the presidential non-endorsement, which many people see as a very public move.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The geographical focus, that being the D.C., Maryland, and Virginia area, is also important. These are areas where the demographics are traditionally not supportive of the MAGA movement, and the shift is seen as a betrayal of the newspaper’s core readership. Some individuals feel they have a right to cancel their subscription.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. There is also a strong reaction toward Bezos himself, who is portrayed in some of the comments as already leaning in the direction of the MAGA ideology. This perception extends beyond the newspaper itself, pointing to Amazon’s business practices and what some see as a lack of ethics.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The humor and sarcasm that some use show a general disdain for the situation. Suggestions that the paper could become a MAGA-themed publication, with a focus on photos of couches, are a thinly veiled criticism of what some feel is a dumbing-down of the paper.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The comments express a sense of loss and disappointment, along with questioning the integrity of the media. The idea that free press is not as free as it claims to be, especially when it comes to supporting certain narratives, is also a concern. This is an opinion shared by many.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. There is a concern that the focus on the MAGA platform also undermines the paper’s journalistic standards. Others insist the newspaper already has a bias and the shift is already in motion.
Vance Urged Bezos to Make the Washington Post Even More MAGA. The sentiment is a reflection of how the newspaper’s editorial choices and business decisions are perceived by the public, and how many are feeling in return. The reaction also highlights how quickly reputations can change in today’s media landscape.