By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The U.S. military conducted its 20th strike on a boat suspected of drug trafficking in the Caribbean Sea, resulting in four fatalities and raising the total death toll from these operations to 80 since September. The U.S. Southern Command confirmed the vessel was involved in illicit narcotics smuggling. Simultaneously, the Trump administration is expanding its military presence in the region with the deployment of the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, solidifying its ongoing mission, Operation Southern Spear. While the administration claims the buildup is focused on stopping drug flow, concerns arise, with some suggesting this is an intimidation tactic against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who faces accusations of narcoterrorism.
Read the original article here
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: This news is definitely stirring up some strong reactions, and it’s easy to see why. The core of the issue seems to be a deep-seated distrust of the actions, particularly the unilateral targeting of vessels in international waters. A common sentiment is that, regardless of the alleged illicit activities, the killings are, at their base, extrajudicial. This raises serious questions about due process and the rule of law, which are fundamental principles of justice.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: The use of the word “alleged” is particularly highlighted, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence and the presumption of innocence. Critics suggest that simply labeling a boat as a “drug boat” isn’t enough justification for a lethal strike, especially when carried out far from U.S. shores. The argument is that this approach essentially turns the U.S. into a lawless entity, operating outside the bounds of international law and committing state-sponsored murder.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: The shift in tactics, from interception and boarding to outright destruction, is another point of concern. The previous practice of tracking and intercepting vessels, allowing for apprehension and prosecution, is seen as a more lawful and humane approach. Now, it’s suggested that by simply blowing up these vessels, the U.S. is crossing the line into terrorism.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: The frustration extends beyond the legality of the actions, with many questioning the effectiveness of this strategy. The point is made that despite these 20 strikes, the flow of drugs into the U.S. continues, and nobody is sharing the impact on illegal drug imports. The lack of apparent results further fuels the criticism, suggesting that the actions are more about posturing and political maneuvers than about stemming the drug trade.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: Many of the commenters believe there’s a troubling pattern, where the U.S. seems to operate with a double standard, ignoring international laws that they expect others to uphold. There’s a widespread feeling that the U.S. is setting dangerous precedents, where the powerful can do as they please on the open seas. The question of accountability is also raised: who is held responsible for these deaths, and what recourse do the victims have?
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: Some commentators express a sense of shame and disappointment in their country’s actions. They lament the image this presents to the world and express solidarity with those who are affected by these strikes. Others emphasize that, in their view, the actions are politically motivated and a precursor to larger conflicts, possibly with the aim of securing oil and other resources. There’s a strong feeling that the war on drugs is being used as a cover for geopolitical objectives.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: There’s a clear distrust of the current political environment, with some attributing these actions directly to specific political figures. The argument is made that this particular administration is more brazen about such actions than previous administrations, and there is a feeling that other Presidents would have chosen a more muted approach. There is also the sentiment that some people are voting for these very actions, and there are complaints on their behalf.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: The discussion touches on the broader context of international law and its enforceability. The point is made that international law is only as effective as its enforcement, and the perception is that the U.S. doesn’t respect it. The opinion is that the high seas have become a free-for-all, with the U.S. acting like a pirate.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: The lack of trust in official narratives is also evident. The call for irrefutable evidence for each of the strikes is a sign of deep-seated skepticism, and it’s easy to see why, considering the stakes. A recurring theme is that, if these boats are drug boats, why aren’t they being boarded? The answer, many believe, is a lack of political will, a desire to create a show of force, or perhaps even something else entirely.
20th U.S. strike on alleged drug boat leaves 4 dead: Some feel that these strikes are a distraction. The criticism is not just about the legality or the morality; it’s about the underlying motivations and the potential for a larger conflict. There is the suggestion that these actions could lead to a chain reaction, where the targeted parties might retaliate, leading to further escalation. The idea that Trump supporters will have to “own their evil doing one day” is a harsh reminder of the divided climate of the United States.