By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Newly revealed data indicates the U.S. Navy was aware of potentially dangerous levels of airborne plutonium at the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco for nearly a year before alerting city officials. The plutonium levels, detected in November, exceeded federal action thresholds near a residential area slated for redevelopment. This discovery adds to a series of controversies concerning radioactive material at the former nuclear weapons testing site, with advocates raising concerns about the navy’s transparency and clean-up efforts, citing a history of cover-ups.
Read the original article here
US navy accused of cover-up over dangerous plutonium in San Francisco, and honestly, where do we even begin with this one? It’s a story that’s got all the hallmarks of a classic, yet infuriating, tale of potential environmental disaster and government opacity. The core issue revolves around the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco, an area designated as a Superfund site, meaning it’s officially recognized as being contaminated with hazardous substances, and the US Navy is now facing accusations of a cover-up regarding dangerous plutonium there.
The discovery of nuclear waste, specifically plutonium, at a place like Hunters Point, isn’t exactly a huge surprise. The area was used for various military activities, including ship repair and, crucially, testing, and other activities during World War II, and with that comes the inevitable potential for contamination. The issue isn’t just the presence of the plutonium, but the lack of transparency, with the Navy being accused of not fully disclosing the extent of the contamination and even potentially downplaying the risks involved. Apparently, it’s not the Navy’s problem, its the EPA’s, and the City and Developers for wanting to develop homes there.
One of the most alarming aspects highlighted in this whole situation is the potential amount of plutonium involved. We’re talking about a metric fuckton, to use a more graphic term, or at least two kilograms, which is enough to raise serious health concerns. Experts will tell you that the inhalation of even a minuscule amount of plutonium can significantly increase the risk of cancer. And with the Navy’s apparent unwillingness to fully assess and clean up the site, the risks are heightened. There is even mention of burning irradiated fuel on site, which certainly doesn’t help matters.
Adding to the complexity of the situation are the allegations of falsified data and manipulated samples. There are claims of individuals involved with the site, including those responsible for surveys and testing, who may have been involved in unethical behavior, like swapping contaminated soil for clean soil to get better results. This kind of behavior not only undermines the integrity of the cleanup efforts but also erodes public trust in the authorities responsible for ensuring the safety of the environment and the health of the community.
The potential for disaster doesn’t end there, as some have pointed out that a major earthquake could release the contaminants into the atmosphere. The mere thought of a natural disaster further spreading the radioactive materials around is enough to give anyone a chill.
Then, there’s the question of the Navy’s actions related to the clean-up itself. There are accusations that the Navy is trying to avoid spending billions of dollars on a proper clean-up. This raises serious questions about their priorities and commitment to public safety. Are they prioritizing cost-cutting over the health and well-being of the surrounding community? It’s hard not to wonder what else they’re trying to hide.
The fact that the site is located in a historically Black neighborhood adds another layer of injustice to the situation. Environmental issues disproportionately affect minority communities, so a cover-up of this magnitude would be particularly egregious. It’s a prime example of environmental racism, where a marginalized community is left to bear the brunt of the pollution.
As for the broader implications, this story is just another illustration of a pattern that’s been seen over and over again. From radioactive waste at an elementary school to general waste at sites across the country, it’s a sobering reminder of the long-term consequences of careless industrial practices and a lack of accountability. It also shines a spotlight on the challenges of cleaning up historical contamination, the political and economic pressures at play, and the importance of holding those responsible accountable.
It’s a reminder of a few things. First, the public needs to be vigilant and demand greater transparency from government agencies. Secondly, it is important to remember the dangers associated with nuclear waste. Finally, the story is far from over. With a Superfund site, the situation is evolving. Public awareness, scrutiny, and persistence are essential to ensure the Navy fulfills its responsibility to fully address the contamination at Hunters Point and protect the health and safety of the community.