By John Q. Hosedrinker 
U.S. Catholic bishops have elected Archbishop Paul Coakley as their new president, signaling a conservative direction for the conference during Donald Trump’s second term. Coakley, known for his conservative views, previously served as secretary and defeated centrist candidate Bishop Daniel Flores, who was elected vice president. This choice may heighten tensions with the Vatican and its emphasis on inclusivity, as many U.S. bishops often disagree with the Vatican. The bishops are currently working on a statement regarding immigration, advocating for migrants’ rights while grappling with the Trump administration’s policies.
Read the original article here
US Catholic bishops select conservative culture warrior to lead them during Trump’s second term – that’s quite a headline, isn’t it? It immediately conjures up a specific image and raises a lot of questions. Based on what’s being said, it seems like this decision by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is not sitting well with a lot of people, and for some very strong reasons. The common thread running through the comments is a deep dissatisfaction, even outrage, at the direction the American Catholic Church appears to be heading, particularly its perceived embrace of conservative politics and cultural battles.
This alignment with a “culture warrior” during a potential second Trump term seems to be a major point of contention. The core of the issue seems to be a perceived betrayal of core Catholic values, especially the emphasis on social justice, compassion for the marginalized, and adherence to the teachings of the Pope. Many feel this new leader represents a shift away from these fundamental principles and towards a more politically charged, partisan stance. The concern, voiced repeatedly, is that the Church is becoming more aligned with Trumpism than with the teachings of Jesus Christ.
The words used to describe this situation paint a vivid picture: “disgrace,” “hell,” “hateful politics,” and accusations of prioritizing power and politics over faith. It’s not just about disagreeing with political views; it’s about feeling that the Church is actively undermining its own mission. The phrase “Trump fan boy” and the implication that the Church is now focused on “culture war bullshit” rather than the core tenets of faith, underscore this growing disillusionment. This selection seems to be seen as a direct contradiction to the values that many were taught and expected from the Church.
The issue of the Church’s handling of sexual abuse is a recurring theme, and the comments make it clear that this is a major source of distrust. Concerns are raised about how this new leader might impact the Church’s response to this ongoing crisis. The perception is that the Church has a pattern of protecting wrongdoers. It’s a very serious accusation, and it colors much of the commentary.
Another aspect highlighted is the potential for further decline in church membership. Many seem to believe that the Church’s embrace of right-wing politics will accelerate the trend of people leaving the faith. The perception is that the Church is losing touch with its core values and alienating its members. It’s easy to see why someone would leave the Church if they feel it’s prioritizing politics over its religious mission.
The frustration is also directed toward the disconnect between the U.S. bishops and Pope Francis. The belief seems to be that the bishops are moving in a direction contrary to the Pope’s teachings and priorities. It’s hard to understand how the priests can be at odds with an infallible Pope. This tension creates a sense of division and uncertainty within the Church. It’s a conflict that potentially contributes to the sense of crisis.
However, there’s also the suggestion of potential for positive change. The presence of Bishop Flores as Vice President is seen as a source of hope. His eloquent defense of Catholic social teachings gives the feeling that there is still the possibility of a different path. He offers a contrasting view and a potential for leadership.
In short, the selection of a “conservative culture warrior” to lead the U.S. Catholic bishops during a potential second Trump term has sparked outrage, disillusionment, and concern. The comments indicate that many people see this as a betrayal of core Catholic values, a continuation of the Church’s failings, and a path toward further decline. The selection will likely lead to greater division, and it’s something that will continue to spark discussion and debate within the Catholic community and beyond.