By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A listing of German food aid services, initially included on a U.S. Army Garrison Bavaria webpage as a resource for furloughed employees, has since been removed. The list of support organizations was meant for local national employees, not American troops, due to concerns about potential payment issues during the government shutdown. The information was part of guidance provided by the Army’s Installation Management Command-Europe. Despite the removal, various American-run sources, such as food pantries and school donation drives, are available to assist U.S. military families with food aid during the shutdown.
Read the original article here
Referral to German food aid resources disappears from US Army Garrison Bavaria website. Well, it seems there’s been a significant change on the US Army Garrison Bavaria website, and it’s raising some eyebrows. Specifically, the link or information directing soldiers and their families to German food aid resources has been removed. Now, the obvious question is, why?
The reason for the removal seems pretty straightforward: the guidance was essentially useless. US soldiers, as it turns out, aren’t eligible to access German food banks. This is because eligibility for these resources is often tied to receiving social benefits within Germany, something US soldiers stationed there generally don’t qualify for. They are considered employed, and not residents in the same way, thus the programs are not available.
There’s a sense of bewilderment surrounding this situation. On one hand, you have the US military, a behemoth of an organization with a massive budget, and on the other, you have reports of soldiers potentially facing food insecurity. It’s a jarring contrast and one that has sparked debate and questions. The reality is, soldiers aren’t able to use the resources they were pointed to.
The removal of the referral also highlights broader concerns, specifically around the resources provided to US soldiers and their families stationed overseas. There’s a perception that the Department of Defense, and the current administration, aren’t prioritizing their needs sufficiently. It brings to mind past instances of the US providing aid to others, such as the Berlin Airlift, but it now appears the government cannot support its own personnel.
It’s hard not to notice the irony when considering recent discussions surrounding the military. While the US government talks about the importance of supporting troops, it’s also been mentioned that some troops are struggling to have enough to eat. It is even more concerning when placed against the backdrop of accusations of misusing resources or making poor financial decisions. The contrast is difficult to ignore.
Adding a further layer of complexity is the question of eligibility. While non-citizens accessing public programs has become a hot topic in the US, the idea of directing soldiers to use the same programs in Germany doesn’t make logical sense. There is also the issue of what should be done if soldiers are truly struggling to feed themselves. Food banks may not turn people away if they need help, regardless of citizenship.
Of course, the historical context also deserves mention. In the aftermath of World War II, US soldiers were seen as heroes, offering assistance to the people of Germany. Now, it seems, they are left to fend for themselves, or at least, unable to access the resources they need.
The situation has opened a critical conversation about priorities. The situation is seen as an embarrassment, a sign of a lack of leadership and a failure to take care of those who serve. Given that the military is one of the biggest budget lines the US government manages, it is a very valid critique.